you think that could be what that is? I was wondering. I'm hoping that maybe next year (if they make it) it will fix itself.Strangely, I see more and more of these "one screwy antler" bucks with each passing year. I have no idea why, other than more older bucks in the population, more fighting, hence more opportunities for body and antler pedicle injuries.
I have more of those in my immediate area than normal, typical racks.Strangely, I see more and more of these "one screwy antler" bucks with each passing year. I have no idea why, other than more older bucks in the population, more fighting, hence more opportunities for body and antler pedicle injuries.
My thoughts as well. The last 4 years have shown that on our place. When watching these videos, I thought, "that's all too familiar".Strangely, I see more and more of these "one screwy antler" bucks with each passing year. I have no idea why, other than more older bucks in the population, more fighting, hence more opportunities for body and antler pedicle injuries.
It's crazy how many of these I see now. used to be very rare. Now, commonplace.I have more of those in my immediate area than normal, typical racks.
If it is due to a body injury, it could fix itself the next year. If pedicle injury, it will only get worse.you think that could be what that is? I was wondering. I'm hoping that maybe next year (if they make it) it will fix itself.
Strangely, I see more and more of these "one screwy antler" bucks with each passing year. I have no idea why, other than more older bucks in the population, more fighting, hence more opportunities for body and antler pedicle injuries.
Absolutely what you just said! I remember seeing any antlers was super exciting.I agree 100%. Unintended, unforeseen byproduct of conservation practices. For most of my life hunters killed any buck just because it was a buck, even if it were a 4pt yearling. In more modern times the hunter mindset has changed to allowing young bucks to grow so there would be more and bigger bucks to hunt. And it works. But more rack bucks means more competition for does and these funky antlers I believe is the result. Not exactly what anyone anticipated but in hindsight makes sense. I see so many rack bucks these days that seeing a yearling buck doesn't even raise an eyebrow. I remember a time when seeing any buck at all was a big deal.
It's an amazing time to be in the deer woods! This is perhaps the pinnacle of whitetail hunting in the timeframe we have been given to chase these amazing critters!!!I agree 100%. Unintended, unforeseen byproduct of conservation practices. For most of my life hunters killed any buck just because it was a buck, even if it were a 4pt yearling. In more modern times the hunter mindset has changed to allowing young bucks to grow so there would be more and bigger bucks to hunt. And it works. But more rack bucks means more competition for does and these funky antlers I believe is the result. Not exactly what anyone anticipated but in hindsight makes sense. I see so many rack bucks these days that seeing a yearling buck doesn't even raise an eyebrow. I remember a time when seeing any buck at all was a big deal.
Absolutely what you just said! I remember seeing any antlers was super exciting.
I agree. I started deer hunting in the late 70s in KY. Seeing an antlered buck was a rare treat. I remember when a season's success was judged on whether you saw an antlered buck or not! My how things have changed.It's an amazing time to be in the deer woods! This is perhaps the pinnacle of whitetail hunting in the timeframe we have been given to chase these amazing critters!!!
The one interesting caveat I would add to this is I believe it is more about buck density than it is age structure. I have numerous projects where I've been monitoring the buck population for years. And in several of these, the buck age structure - the percent of bucks in the older and mature age-classes - hasn't changed much over the years. But what has changed is the total number of bucks; i.e. the buck density. The buck density - total number of bucks per square mile - has gone up and sometimes dramatically. The percentage of bucks with "one screwy antler" has increased hand-in-hand with these buck density numbers and doesn't seem to be a closely correlated with changes in buck age structure.I agree 100%. Unintended, unforeseen byproduct of conservation practices. For most of my life hunters killed any buck just because it was a buck, even if it were a 4pt yearling. In more modern times the hunter mindset has changed to allowing young bucks to grow so there would be more and bigger bucks to hunt. And it works. But more rack bucks means more competition for does and these funky antlers I believe is the result. Not exactly what anyone anticipated but in hindsight makes sense. I see so many rack bucks these days that seeing a yearling buck doesn't even raise an eyebrow. I remember a time when seeing any buck at all was a big deal.
It's an amazing time to be in the deer woods! This is perhaps the pinnacle of whitetail hunting in the timeframe we have been given to chase these amazing critters!!!
The one interesting caveat I would add to this is I believe it is more about buck density than it is age structure. I have numerous projects where I've been monitoring the buck population for years. And in several of these, the buck age structure - the percent of bucks in the older and mature age-classes - hasn't changed much over the years. But what has changed is the total number of bucks; i.e. the buck density. The buck density - total number of bucks per square mile - has gone up and sometimes dramatically. The percentage of bucks with "one screwy antler" has increased hand-in-hand with these buck density numbers and doesn't seem to be a closely correlated with changes in buck age structure.
Now this doesn't mean buck age structure plays no role. These monitored properties have been working on improving their buck age structure for many years, hence have had older buck age structures for many years. So I strongly suspect suddenly improving the buck age structure on a property would produce an increase in screwy racks, but a sudden increase in buck density appears to be a more powerful player.