Bgoodman30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,691
Now the Deer Association has stated that cold fronts don't affect deer movement from their collar research... I could get on board with the moon thing but dis too much...
-
Help Support TNDeer:
Cold fronts do affect deer movement..?
- Thread starter Bgoodman30
- Start date
Hymie3
Well-Known Member
So apparently nothing affects deer movement???
Bgoodman30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,691
Nope years of hunting and cameras deer movement was just a figure of our imagination..
lol
Well-Known Member
Maybe my mountain deer are different. The only daytime movement I've documented since mid October was during the cold spell last week. Every day but one I had deer in my food plot during daylight on days when the overnight temp was in the teens. Since it warmed back up, nothing.
swampbadger
Well-Known Member
What a bunch of garbage. I don't care about their study. Maybe the deer they study don't have to travel far food to bed.
I know this much though, Deer get cold when it's cold outside. They move to areas that protect them from the elements. They still have to burn more energy to stay warm when it's below freezing for long periods. They have to feed more often or they will starve to death during those extremely cold times.
I know I've seen better more consistent movement when it's colder.
I know this much though, Deer get cold when it's cold outside. They move to areas that protect them from the elements. They still have to burn more energy to stay warm when it's below freezing for long periods. They have to feed more often or they will starve to death during those extremely cold times.
I know I've seen better more consistent movement when it's colder.
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
- Messages
- 4,219
Obviously you have missed my diatribes on this in the past....
I have argued several times with Dr. Deifenbach at Penn State about this topic and he is unrelenting - but also admittedly not a hunter himself. They do great work, but in this case they misinterpreted their own findings.
Why?
1. The GPS collars don't show movement type in great enough detail to discern the type of movement that affects sightings
2. They usually exclude rut period data during this study, which is when most people hunt
3. They are using any temperature drop associated with a front as a "cold front"
In the PSU study, they looked at October movement only. A typical October day is Mid 70s with some days in the 80s. A typical October cold front isn't really "cold". Early October deer are still forming their winter coats.
My last statement to Defienbach is that if weather doesn't affect deer sightings, here's what we will do. I will invite you out to my farm to hunt 5 days of my choosing. I will then hunt 5 days of my choosing. We will see who sees more deer. He declined.
This new flush of GPS collar "deer science" lately is getting about as believable as covid science. You can tell me the sky is green all you want and show me all your research to prove it, but I can simply look up and see for myself that it is indeed actually blue like I've known all along. It's getting ridiculous.
ImThere
Well-Known Member
I killed a 5 yr old big mature deer on Dec 23 a couple yrs ago when we had that flash freeze. I think it was zero or below. I had pics of him but only at night until that day. I saw more big deer that day and deer I've never seen than any other time. Time in the field/common sense>scientific studies.
Bgoodman30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,691
Yes I have and they obviously left out most of this info from their post to stir the pot and create more clicks...
348Winchester
Well-Known Member
My latest study indicates there is less deer movement when deer are not moving.
I scrolled thru a TikTok video last night where the "expert" was saying the same thing. They said weather fronts and temperatures had zero effect on deer movement. Oh and they also said the rut happens the same exact time every year because it is triggered by the amount of sunlight during the day time.
The rut does happen the same time every year within a few days due to photoperiod. But no fronts and temps play a huge roll in movement as we all know
The bucks were still bachelor grouped up all through October and late November on my farm. While over in Meigs County, the next County over, they were cruising and chasing does at that same time. The ones on my farm are just now making scrapes and doing some cruising and a little chasing. Any idea why it would be different?
Note the date on the pic. Right during Muzzleloader season.
lol
Well-Known Member
Up in South CNF in Monroe county, first sign of any rutting behavior I've seen was the first of the month when I caught some bucks sparring on camera and another following a doe at the same time. A couple days later, I found my first rub that looked maybe a day old.
Ok i shouldn't have made such a broad statement apparently (forgive me) photoperiod does essentially kick off the rut as in velvet coming off , does beginning to come in estrus. Now where you see rut activity on a certain day you will see it within a fewdays the same time next year in that area. Why its different on different farms only 50 miles apart is beyond me but it will be (basically) the same time frame on the same lands year after year.
backyardtndeer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
- Messages
- 4,219
To clarify, peak breeding happens at the same time every year for YOUR area. It's genetic.
The amount of activity we see changes, but fetal conception studies have confirmed the breeding dates don't change by much year to year for any given area. Usually just a few days difference for the peak.
BSK
Well-Known Member
I think the disconnect between research findings and hunters is that they are looking at different things. For example, in the study on how bucks reacted to increased hunting pressure, GPS collar data showed bucks actually increased the average distance they travelled each day under increased hunting pressure. Why, and the reason for the disconnect, is that bucks increased the distance they travelled each day under heavier hunting pressure because they had to take a more circuitous route to get from Point A to Point B and stay within heavy cover to hide from hunters. The researcher looks at the raw data - miles travelled each day - and says, "See, bucks aren't reacting to hunting pressure like everyone thought they would." The hunters suddenly see less bucks because the bucks are winding through every little patch of cover during their daily travels to hide from hunters. The bucks are travelling more miles per day, yet hunters are seeing fewer of them. The researchers need to look at the sum-total of the data, not one little piece of the data.
In the research Bgoodman30 is referencing (and I haven't seen the study), I can guarantee you the problem is the researchers look at the raw data and find bucks don't increase the amount of time they are active during a cold snap. Yet they probably are not looking at where and when bucks are active during a cold snap. That is what hunters are interested in. If a buck sticks to thick cover and moves 6 hours a day in hot weather (much of it during cooler night-time hours), but suddenly starts moving in daylight in open hardwoods for those 6 hours after a cold front, that is night-and-day difference to a hunter, but meaningless to the researcher. The researcher sees 6 hours in warm weather and 6 hours in cool weather and proclaims, "See, no difference."
In the research Bgoodman30 is referencing (and I haven't seen the study), I can guarantee you the problem is the researchers look at the raw data and find bucks don't increase the amount of time they are active during a cold snap. Yet they probably are not looking at where and when bucks are active during a cold snap. That is what hunters are interested in. If a buck sticks to thick cover and moves 6 hours a day in hot weather (much of it during cooler night-time hours), but suddenly starts moving in daylight in open hardwoods for those 6 hours after a cold front, that is night-and-day difference to a hunter, but meaningless to the researcher. The researcher sees 6 hours in warm weather and 6 hours in cool weather and proclaims, "See, no difference."
Until I owned my own ground and really began paying attention to things, I had no idea how exact a doe's estrus cycle can be. I mean to the day. If she pops hot November 3rd this year then she's very, very likely to pop hot November 3rd next year, and so on. Furthermore a doe's female offspring seem to cycle generally around the same time as their mother, so an entire family group of does can be bred within a few days making the days leading up to and right after November 3rd dynamite rut activity on that property. 50 miles away on another farm the local does may not cycle until November 10th so it seems dead while the first farm is hot, then flip flops a week later.
It's not an exact science but it's pretty darn predictable. I've killed many a good target bucks from studying when they were on property the previous year(s). Don Higgins calls it the "same place same time" theory where if a buck is here today then odds are good he'll be here same day next year. That phenomenon is absolutely real and I am convinced it's because that buck knows when the ladies in that immediate area are ready to be bred. No reason to be there if they're not ready so he shows up on que when it's time.
