But please tell me how it's being "greedy" to "let walk" 95% of the bucks you could have killed,Mike Belt":yij3ateo said:Like I've said in the past, I'm greedy. I want age and antlers, lol.
I'd be you'd be killing more 150-plus class bucks at Ames if you had no antler restrictions at all, coupled with a 1-buck limit. Might be the case even with the 2-buck limit.Mike Belt":2x1xzcse said:LBL . . . There's a bunch of guys up there over the years that are probably glad I'm so particular. I've said this before. I know a 125" buck is legal to shoot where we hunt but if these guys would let those walk, and particularly the 2.5 year olds, we might have some dandies running around.
I've also been puzzled by how so often so many get things totally backwards.Mike Belt":2x1xzcse said:. . . . has always puzzled me about the arguments made statewide against hunters holding out for bigger bucks.
By doing so it leaves a bigger population for those that desire to shoot anything with antlers.
Mike Belt":19nrrxzd said:Agreed. That's exactly why they walked away from me. No guarantee in what they might be next year other than I gave them a chance at seeing next year. Those are the kind of bucks I love/hate to see. They excite you until you finally get a good look at them and even then you're excited for the prospects of next year. At the same time they scare you and under the right circumstances could create a mistaken shooting. I call them pucker bucks because if you squeeze the trigger on one you stay all puckered up going to the checking station to have them scored and aged. I like those 1 lookers because that's all it takes to determine whether they're shooters or not.