• Help Support TNDeer:

HOOK/Columbia Dave- pictures for you

monsterbuck07

monsterbuck07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
3,327
Reaction score
1
Location
Alabama
Since the two of you guys felt the need to assume that my "edited" trail camera pictures seemed to be fake, I took the time to call the land owner and have him send over some of the actual trail camera photos. Sad that I have to do it, but like in my other post where this started...it's the world today and I will not be made out to be a liar. If either one of y'all need more photos...it's not happening, I will continue posting edited photos. It's easier to upload that way from a cell phone. If you don't buy into them being the size deer for a certain area, I am sorry.

Columbia Dave, he did not send over any of the split G2 buck yet, but this is the picture unedited I received from last week when he scouted the field. He uses a cheap digital camera and if you look at some of the deer I post there are numerous deer on the property with split G2s. If this is "your" deer, his legs are tired, cause he traveled a heck of a long way.
















And if you need more proof go retrace my old post, this is the buck we hunted in 2011... Pictures are in the SAME location as first three pictures above. And notice its a picture of a screen AGAIN. I upload from a phone to a CPU when in the woods with no WIFI!

 
And now that I have the two pictures together I kind of surprised myself, is the bottom deer the same deer as the deer in pictures 4-6? I see a lot of similaraties.
 
I'd say it is.... looks like he has good mass and bases. If it is the same.... his antlers grew more upward and then out as compared to outward last year. Could be brothers by the same dad...
 
That's a GIANT! I'd say he's in the 170's anyway... AS far as the same buck from last year his brows are very different and so is the end of his right main beam. I'd have to guess he is a different buck but being a non-typical maybe he'd change more drastically than your typical buck. That being said it's hard to believe there's another "new" big non-typical buck in the exact same spot the following year...

I hope you kill him!!!
 
That's a stud! I don't see why people would think you were lying. There are bigger bucks on the internet to copy and paste if someone wanted to.
 
monsterbuck07 said:
Since the two of you guys felt the need to assume that my "edited" trail camera pictures seemed to be fake, I took the time to call the land owner and have him send over some of the actual trail camera photos. Sad that I have to do it, but like in my other post where this started...it's the world today and I will not be made out to be a liar. If either one of y'all need more photos...it's not happening, I will continue posting edited photos. It's easier to upload that way from a cell phone. If you don't buy into them being the size deer for a certain area, I am sorry.

Columbia Dave, he did not send over any of the split G2 buck yet, but this is the picture unedited I received from last week when he scouted the field. He uses a cheap digital camera and if you look at some of the deer I post there are numerous deer on the property with split G2s. If this is "your" deer, his legs are tired, cause he traveled a heck of a long way.
















And if you need more proof go retrace my old post, this is the buck we hunted in 2011... Pictures are in the SAME location as first three pictures above. And notice its a picture of a screen AGAIN. I upload from a phone to a CPU when in the woods with no WIFI!

Click to expand...
why waste your time man you dont have to prove anything to those guys.if they dont believe it oh well maybe if they would manage their property they would have big deer .
 
I don't think it is the same deer based off of the brow tine angle. Could have some of the same genetics though! Great deer either way!
 
Very nice deer. Got any more pics of the very tall rack buck? That one is almost as cool as the big freak nasty.
 
monsterbuck07 said:
And now that I have the two pictures together I kind of surprised myself, is the bottom deer the same deer as the deer in pictures 4-6? I see a lot of similaraties.
Click to expand...

Do you have any pics of the 2011 deer in color showing the bottom of his back legs? It may be the angle that the 2013 deer is standing, but he looks to have more white than normal that wraps from the inside of both back legs to the front.

I know that it is mentioned above that the brow tines are different which the initial reaction is that they are not. I can see similiarities though. The left side brow tine on both comes out nearly the same. The 2011 deer has a crook in the brow tine, but this could be due to an injury during velvet. If you just compare the base of the right side on both, they both have the same angle as it comes from the main beam.
 
TN Larry said:
monsterbuck07 said:
And now that I have the two pictures together I kind of surprised myself, is the bottom deer the same deer as the deer in pictures 4-6? I see a lot of similaraties.
Click to expand...

Do you have any pics of the 2011 deer in color showing the bottom of his back legs? It may be the angle that the 2013 deer is standing, but he looks to have more white than normal that wraps from the inside of both back legs to the front.

I know that it is mentioned above that the brow tines are different which the initial reaction is that they are not. I can see similiarities though. The left side brow tine on both comes out nearly the same. The 2011 deer has a crook in the brow tine, but this could be due to an injury during velvet. If you just compare the base of the right side on both, they both have the same angle as it comes from the main beam.
Click to expand...

I do not have any other pictures of him in 2011. However I do know that on his right ear in 2011 and 2012 he had a large cut...in all of the pics of the non typical from above I have not noticed the cut, which is why I beleive its a different deer.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top