If Georgia will be ranked number 1 next week?
Lol
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Lol
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
RUGER":314u01gf said:If Georgia will be ranked number 1 next week?
Lol
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
EastTNHunter":18q7ara9 said:Because of recency bias and the media's love affair for certain teams, I expect them to drop to between #6-10. Think about it, they have played 2 and beaten 1 team in the top 10. Who really has the resume to be #s 2-4? Bama has played a relatively weak schedule (through no real fault of their own), but they are obviously head and shoulders above everyone else, bar none. EVERYONE else has major flaws, and I've been saying that for a while, including about my DAWGS.
UGA would have been better off to have lost a game earlier in the season, but they shouldn't have lost that bad to anyone and deserve whatever ranking the pollsters give them. Auburn played lights out and proved that they are much improved over their two losses earlier in the year.
RUGER":131y61jp said:If Georgia will be ranked number 1 next week?
Lol
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
PillsburyDoughboy":32hvkvjb said:RUGER":32hvkvjb said:If Georgia will be ranked number 1 next week?
Lol
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
I said a couple of weeks ago I did not think they were playing at a # 3 level ... then this #1 shenanigans came about and I was like OK let's see how long that last .
It was not long .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think when I said that a few weeks ago the AP was having a hard time finding anyone to rank in the top 2-5 slot .EastTNHunter":1o6u5b9n said:PillsburyDoughboy":1o6u5b9n said:RUGER":1o6u5b9n said:If Georgia will be ranked number 1 next week?
Lol
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
I said a couple of weeks ago I did not think they were playing at a # 3 level ... then this #1 shenanigans came about and I was like OK let's see how long that last .
It was not long .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who do you think is? I said the same thing then and now, but who's your suggestion for 2-4? You obviously know everything, so enlighten us.
PillsburyDoughboy":x3m4oc6a said:I said a couple of weeks ago I did not think they were playing at a # 3 level ...
I would say putting them anywhere 3-6 feels about right at this point .