• Help Support TNDeer:

Over/under

NoNtYpiCaL1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2008
Messages
648
Reaction score
0
Location
McKenzie, TN
Does anyone shoot over/under turkey hunting. I been thinking about the options that would open up with 2 different chokes and shell combos in one gun. Could be more versatile at different ranges. Maybe I'm just looking for a good reason for a new gun.
 
For many years my primary turkey gun was a side-by-side.

Started using that gun back before the "specialized" turkey guns & chokes became popular.

It was factory bored extra-full (left) and full (right), and did a great job out to about 40 yards, even with just 2 3/4" chambers.

Even though I liked the idea of loading the tighter choked barrel with smaller shot (head shot) and the other barrel with larger shot (body shot), I usually just loaded both with #5's because with that gun, #5's would pattern almost as dense and even more uniformly than #6's. Since the #5's would easily break wing and leg bones, usually didn't see the need for going to #4 pellets.

The ONLY reason I've about quit using that gun for turkey hunting is because I wanted to use an optical sight, which was not easily mounted on a side-by-side. If it had been practical to mount a low-power scope, I'd probably still be using it, and feel little "handicap" by the 2 3/4" chambers. Over the years, most turkeys I've killed have been under 25 yards, and it's my opinion that too much choke can actually be as much a liability as an asset, causing about as many up-close misses as long-range kills.

If I were using any double gun with choke tubes, would like the idea of one being an extra-full and the other being a modified.

But if I were buying a new turkey gun, I'd recommend an automatic for several reasons:

1) One barrel is less noticable than a pair of barrels to a turkey.

2) Automatics are inherently less "noisy" to carry than pumps. Pump actions seem to have a "rattle" from the action shifting a bit while carrying/walking. I've seen people spook turkeys with that noise.

3) Automatics have the least recoil. Maybe not a big deal, but a noticeable difference when pattern testing.

4) Less options to mount an optical sight on a double gun. This would be my main reason for not going with a double gun as a turkey gun.

5) SHOULD you need follow up shot(s), nice to have a magazine with 3 extra rounds compared to just one with a double gun.


If we limit ourselves to high-probability shots, seldom should a 2nd shot be needed. But just in case, I do have my automatic loaded with progressively larger shot for each subsequent round. Typically, my chambered load is #7, as I only go for head shots, else don't take that initial shot. The next chambered load is #6, the next is #5, and all my turkey shells are now any of the heavier-than-lead types.
 
People have been using muzzle loaders for hundreds of years. I figure a O/U is much more than enough. Plus, dual purpose for upland game, etc.
 
Any reason is a good reason for a new gun :D

My issue would be with weight...turkey hunting, I want to be as mobile as possible. The additional weight, real or perceived, with and O/U would deter my from choosing one as a option for turkeys.

If I were serious, I would look at a CZ.
 
CBU93 said:
Any reason is a good reason for a new gun :D

My issue would be with weight...turkey hunting, I want to be as mobile as possible. The additional weight, real or perceived, with and O/U would deter my from choosing one as a option for turkeys.

If I were serious, I would look at a CZ.

I think your concern over weight is a little misplaced. I have an O/U Stoeger that seems to me to be lighter than any of the big (3 1/2") autos. This may be just my perception though since I have never actually checked the weights.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top