Nope. No 2 loss team deserves to be in the playoff. This ain't the NFL.Does the tone change now that y'all are 2 loss as well?
TN still better than Bammer. Plus nicky would slide under the table to get his Bammers in the playoff and @PillsburyDoughboy would take one for the team for nicky. Hell I bet @prestide would alsoNope. No 2 loss team deserves to be in the playoff. This ain't the N
I've always thought it should be more than 4 but not sure what that # is. If you stop at 8 then 9 will complain. If you stop at 16 then #17 will complain. For now I say leave it at 4 and let the chips fall where they do.Does the tone change now that y'all are 2 loss as well?
Because u could make a great argument for why teams 5- 8 should be in there but realistically none of those are going to be National Champions this year. They just don't have it.I've always thought it should be more than 4 but not sure what that # is. If you stop at 8 then 9 will complain. If you stop at 16 then #17 will complain. For now I say leave it at 4 and let the chips fall where they do.
Some years are more cut and dry than others as well. Sometimes there's a clear front runner. But sometimes I feel like #3 or #4 may not be as good as a lower ranked team just because of schedule. But usually #1 or #2 came out of the conference that a better 5 or 6 are in and they have already settled things in regular seasonI've always thought it should be more than 4 but not sure what that # is. If you stop at 8 then 9 will complain. If you stop at 16 then #17 will complain. For now I say leave it at 4 and let the chips fall where they do.
I don't think a great argument could ever be made for a 5-8 team making the playoffs. It's like some high school teams with 1 or 2 wins get in and then get killed.Because u could make a great argument for why teams 5- 8 should be in there but realistically none of those are going to be National Champions this year. They just don't have it.
I agree and there are definitely better teams year in and year out in the SEC with 2 maybe 3 losses that could give it a run for the money. There's just got to be a cutoff somewhere and no matter where that is somebody won't be happy.Some years are more cut and dry than others as well. Sometimes there's a clear front runner. But sometimes I feel like #3 or #4 may not be as good as a lower ranked team just because of schedule. But usually #1 or #2 came out of the conference that a better 5 or 6 are in and they have already settled things in regular season
Looking at the NCAA rankings this morning. The #9 team would be whining like a whimp. LOLI've always thought it should be more than 4 but not sure what that # is. If you stop at 8 then 9 will complain. If you stop at 16 then #17 will complain. For now I say leave it at 4 and let the chips fall where they do.
Oregon is #9 in the poll I saw. Why the LOL?Looking at the NCAA rankings this morning. The #9 team would be whining like a whimp. LOL
NoDoes the tone change now that y'all are 2 loss as well?
Its true . ALABAMA is having its worse season in 15 years.I think Nick will be fine. ...but that quote is completely made up.