• Help Support TNDeer:

Regular trail camera's

BSK said:
Other models may be good as well, but I've tried a lot of brands and Browning currently tops everything I've tried.
Click to expand...
My findings as well, at least anywhere around the Brownings' price points.
Can say same for the Browning cell cams.

When thinking about pricing, don't just consider the initial cost of a cam.

Also consider how often you need to replace batteries, trigger speed, options for settings,
and perhaps most of all: Dependability to get the pics when something walks in front of it!
 
BSK said:
I can only speak for Browning. They are so good function-wise, battery life-wise, and dependability-wise that I've switched to only running Browning. Other models may be good as well, but I've tried a lot of brands and Browning currently tops everything I've tried.
Click to expand...
My thoughts exactly. They are fantastic. Only had to send one back. That would be my choice. Reconyx is really good, but expensive.
 
I have some of their earlier models, but right now I'm focusing on the Spec Ops Elite HP4 and HP5. I like them both. The HP4 has a night flash that is more of a flood-light effect, lighting up the entire area in front of the camera. The HP5 has more of a spotlight effect, getting longer range illumination in the center of the image, but not as much at the edges of the image. The HP5 also has better color in daylight images. I use the HP4 in wooded set-ups, while I use the HP5s primarily on food plots, where the longer range flash is helpful. Both are true black-flash and have shockingly long battery life. I run my cameras from the beginning of August through mid-January and I've never had to change batteries during a season (collecting all video, which takes a lot of juice for the night-time illumination). In fact, often they are still going strong the next season.
 
When I was using regular cams I had 6-8 wildgame cams. Some would last for years and some would crap out after a year or less. I just considered them throw aways as I'd find sales on them for $30-50. They always tooks good pics but the best pics were from Browning's I had. Don't remember the model right off but bought 3 off a member here and all worked great. 2 got stolen out of my truck and the 1 I have left I haven't used it in 2-3 years.
 
I'm still amazed you can get the quality of the HP4 and HP5 at around $190 retail. That's not cheap, but considering the quality of the units and the quality of the images/videos from a true black-flash, it's still an amazing price. When black-flash first came out, a decent unit ran $600.
 
rem270 said:
When I was using regular cams I had 6-8 wildgame cams. Some would last for years and some would crap out after a year or less. I just considered them throw aways as I'd find sales on them for $30-50. They always tooks good pics but the best pics were from Browning's I had. Don't remember the model right off but bought 3 off a member here and all worked great. 2 got stolen out of my truck and the 1 I have left I haven't used it in 2-3 years.
Click to expand...
I too found the WGI cams a hit or miss proposition. You would get a good one and then get a unit that was garbage. They definitely have a QC problem in their manufacturing. But if you are lucky and get a good one, they are great cameras for the price.
 
BSK said:
I'm still amazed you can get the quality of the HP4 and HP5 at around $190 retail. That's not cheap, but considering the quality of the units and the quality of the images/videos from a true black-flash, it's still an amazing price.
Click to expand...
One very important factor many overlook is battery life.
The long battery life of the HP4 and HP5 can save you over $100 in only a couple years
compared to an initially (point of sale) lower cost cam with poor battery life.
This is even more true when running video.
The HP4 and HP5 cams use 8 AA batteries.

Since I more often prefer still pics over video,
my "go-to" Browning cam (when not wanting cellular feature) is the "Dark Ops" (also a true invisible black flash unit).
The Dark Ops has 2-yr battery life & only requires 6 AA batteries.
It is also physically smaller in size than the HP4-5 units.
Dark Ops typically costs @ $20 less than the HP4-5.

www.trailcampro.com

Browning Dark Ops Pro X 1080 (Non-Cellular)

Learn about the Browning Dark Ops Pro X 1080 trail camera at Trailcampro. We offer thorough game camera reviews to help you choose a quality model.
www.trailcampro.com www.trailcampro.com
 
One thing many people may not realize, the Browning cell cams (as well as most cell cams) can also be used as a "regular" trail cam (simply don't use the cell feature). You can use or not use the cell feature on a monthly basis. For example, you might have a particular unit "off" in July, then turn it "on" (for cellular transmission) in August.

This newest Browning cell model is a "red glow" (I normally prefer "black" flash), but in my experiences with Browning red glow cams, simply set the flash to "economy" mode, and you get the practical equivalent of black flash, yet still have the option for greater flash range if needed (such as using on a field).

On scrapes & salt licks, I only use black flash or red glow set to "economy" (very low-intensity flash).

www.trailcampro.com

Browning Defender Vision Pro (Cellular)

This epic Browning Defender Vision trail camera comes with a 2-year warranty from Trailcampro! Order this high quality camera for a wildlife adventure today.
www.trailcampro.com www.trailcampro.com

At any rate, this particular new Browning cell cam costs less than the Dark Op non-cell.
This cell cam is rated for over a year as a cell cam, so suspect that would mean over 2 yrs if used just as a "regular" trail cam.
 
TheLBLman said:
One very important factor many overlook is battery life.
The long battery life of the HP4 and HP5 can save you over $100 in only a couple years
compared to an initially (point of sale) lower cost cam with poor battery life.
This is even more true when running video.
The HP4 and HP5 cams use 8 AA batteries.

Since I more often prefer still pics over video,
my "go-to" Browning cam (when not wanting cellular feature) is the "Dark Ops" (also a true invisible black flash unit).
The Dark Ops has 2-yr battery life & only requires 6 AA batteries.
It is also physically smaller in size than the HP4-5 units.
Dark Ops typically costs @ $20 less than the HP4-5.

www.trailcampro.com

Browning Dark Ops Pro X 1080 (Non-Cellular)

Learn about the Browning Dark Ops Pro X 1080 trail camera at Trailcampro. We offer thorough game camera reviews to help you choose a quality model.
www.trailcampro.com www.trailcampro.com
Click to expand...
I have several of the Browning Dark Ops Pro XD cameras. They were awesome for their time. And despite what Trailcampro says (they list them as "low-glow"), they are true black-flash. Their downsides are not the greatest night imagery (a bit grainy), and night video illumination is fairly short-range. But they are still good cams. Because of their shorter-range flash, I limit their use to up-close set-ups, such as scrapes.
 
In terms of longevity, I've had good luck with certain models of WGI, Moultrie, Bushnell, Covert, and Muddy. I've had bad luck with WGI, Muddy, & Moultrie. The cheap cameras off any brand seem to be less dependable while the higher end stuff seems to get you what you paid for. That's been my experience.

Moultrie used to be my go to but several years ago they changed things up and went to crap. Not only were the newer line of cameras junk, the firmware in the older cameras were becoming unsupported by newer computer operating systems and Moultrie hasn't done a good job of offering updates. I still have several of their cams that are pretty dang old and still use them without a hitch. But I've lost a lot of them due to not being supported anymore, and nearly all of the newer cams I tried zonked out within a season or so. I had all but given up on them until the most recent cams that are tiny. They take only 4 batteries and if not running video the batteries last well. I've not had one of the tiny cams go bad yet but it's only been a couple seasons so time will tell.

BSK has me on the Browning kick right now. So far he's right and I'm liking them in every way. Good image, good battery life, they don't miss much, and not a lot of false triggers. I also buy a lot of the cheap Amazon cams. They're pretty good for the money but I'm not sure I've had one last more than 2 seasons. Probably have but I lose track. I run dozens of non-cell cams on half dozen or so properties in two states plus public lands I hunt. Lots of them get checked only once a year so in order to keep battery life I set them at lowest image size on single photo mode. Cams that I check regularly enough to keep batteries freshened up will be set at higher quality images or video. The way you use a camera largely dictates battery life and camera longevity. Case in point, a camera watching a summer salt lick will potentially be taking THOUSANDS of pics per week. It's going to zonk out at some point. A camera set to watch an obscure, rarely used rut trail might only take 100 pics in a year. It can soak in place for a couple years without batteries dying and the cam will last forever. So expect some reasonable variance in camera longevity depending on how you use it.
 
Ski said:
Moultrie . . . . . the most recent cams that are tiny. They take only 4 batteries and if not running video the batteries last well. I've not had one of the tiny cams go bad yet but it's only been a couple seasons so time will tell.
Click to expand...
I also have two of Moultrie's most recent version of their tiny 4-battery units.
Moultrie Micro-AC42i
I like how "tiny" they are, but that's about it.
They are not as "user friendly" as prior Moultrie models, and the pics are particularly poor quality for something advertised with such high megapixels. Flash range is also short.
 
TheLBLman said:
I also have two of Moultrie's most recent version of their tiny 4-battery units.
Moultrie Micro-AC42i
I like how "tiny" they are, but that's about it.
They are not as "user friendly" as prior Moultrie models, and the pics are particularly poor quality for something advertised with such high megapixels. Flash range is also short.
Click to expand...

I agree on all points. Given only four batteries I didn't expect much for flash power, especially for the black flash model. However I did expect better image quality. I don't have to have a lot of options or adjustments but I do expect a 42mp camera to take clear pictures, and these cameras do not.
 
BSK said:
I have some of their earlier models, but right now I'm focusing on the Spec Ops Elite HP4 and HP5. I like them both. The HP4 has a night flash that is more of a flood-light effect, lighting up the entire area in front of the camera. The HP5 has more of a spotlight effect, getting longer range illumination in the center of the image, but not as much at the edges of the image. The HP5 also has better color in daylight images. I use the HP4 in wooded set-ups, while I use the HP5s primarily on food plots, where the longer range flash is helpful. Both are true black-flash and have shockingly long battery life. I run my cameras from the beginning of August through mid-January and I've never had to change batteries during a season (collecting all video, which takes a lot of juice for the night-time illumination). In fact, often they are still going strong the next season.
Click to expand...
Thank you sir!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top