Rob-HC Hunter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 623
That's what I would guess.Congratulations on a fantastic 10 pointer!! I'm going to guess he is 5.5 just by body size and size of the bases
That's what I would guess.Congratulations on a fantastic 10 pointer!! I'm going to guess he is 5.5 just by body size and size of the bases
That is interesting. I wonder why they would be so quick to label them young.The "biologists" always seem to screw up the age. At least for KY anyways. They aged my dads 142'' 8 pt at 2.5 a couple years ago. I had 3 years worth of pics so the math didn't math. It was either 4.5 or 5.5. Every single deer they aged when I was at the CWD check station this year was 2.5. They'd stick a finger in and yell out 2.5. I probably watched them do that to 10 bucks just while I was there.
By just sticking a finger in the mouth, I wonder if they're trying to age the deer based on how sharp the tips of the cusps are? That would not be an accurate measure. I need to look straight down on top the teeth. Yes, cusp edges do tend to wear down with age, but not always.The "biologists" always seem to screw up the age. At least for KY anyways. They aged my dads 142'' 8 pt at 2.5 a couple years ago. I had 3 years worth of pics so the math didn't math. It was either 4.5 or 5.5. Every single deer they aged when I was at the CWD check station this year was 2.5. They'd stick a finger in and yell out 2.5. I probably watched them do that to 10 bucks just while I was there.
No telling. These folks were nice but I feel I can age a deer pretty good. They got about half of the ones right they were calling 2.5. They were also misplacing a lot of the samples they took to check for cwd. So that didn't give me a good feeling either. But hey, they're "biologists".By just sticking a finger in the mouth, I wonder if they're trying to age the deer based on how sharp the tips of the cusps are? That would not be an accurate measure. I need to look straight down on top the teeth. Yes, cusp edges do tend to wear down with age, but not always.
That's what they stated on my deer. " How sharp the back teeth wereBy just sticking a finger in the mouth, I wonder if they're trying to age the deer based on how sharp the tips of the cusps are? That would not be an accurate measure. I need to look straight down on top the teeth. Yes, cusp edges do tend to wear down with age, but not always.
Thank you TimberRegardless of age that's super buck!
I totally agree that the type of main food source would have an impact.I've been told by some that ought to know what they are talking about....that deer in agricultural areas teeth won't wear like those eating mostly acorns , browse and food in wooded areas . Makes sense .....
The typical world record the Hanson buck was supposedly 3.5 as well. The buck lived I'm a predominantly agricultural environment. So go figure teeth judging could definitely be skewed !! Body judging also.... only true way is history photos !!Horse feathers if that stud is 3.5 .
I was wondering the same. First I thought it was a Puffin. You said duck and I agree. Did it get answered?Can I ask what's the duck on your hat?