TreyB":72udtqbm said:Targeting imo
Grandslam11":1wh8qlz4 said:TreyB":1wh8qlz4 said:Targeting imo
I get targeting being important but how else do you tackle the guy that is lowering his head running at you?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
the coaches needs to get the officiating body to re-examine the definition of targeting. Sometimes it's called and other times it's not, when it appears, as in thus case, the helmet to helmet meets the definition. When the runner lowers his head and the tackler is making a legitimate tackle and is not spearing or launching, the targeting rule should not take placeTreyB":3auns7v3 said:Grandslam11":3auns7v3 said:TreyB":3auns7v3 said:Targeting imo
I get targeting being important but how else do you tackle the guy that is lowering his head running at you?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree but they call it all the time.
gator-n-buck":1nuh5okh said:If some can make the argument that UF is not a top 10 team. What does that make AUB....??? :rotf:
BamaProud":16jllnh3 said:I picked Florida.
PillsburyDoughboy":16pqjv21 said:Both teams played horrible .
auburn just played worse .
Finally we will see auburn be put in their proper spot in the polls .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk