bloodtrailing
Well-Known Member
May save more jakes than anything. With four tags I think more people will use one or more on a jake.
THIS!The biggest impact will be those like myself that just like to hunt and will save that 3rd tag all season, so in effect we just shoot 2.
The "birds saved" estimate may be more accurate if look at difference in numbers between hunters who killed 3 vs. 2 birds, since so many "save" their last tag to keep on hunting, many killing "one" less than whatever the limit.If indeed only 6% of hunters killed 4, reducing by 1 bird is almost rounding error.
The wound rate and subsequent dead birds from shooting at birds too far with TSS is also a factor. Folks will pop off 60+ yard shots and if they don't get the bird "Oh well, I missed". When in fact, that bird probably has caught a few pellets. Anyone who has killed a bunch of turkeys has likely killed some birds carrying lead shot from another hunter. But with TSS, that shot penetrates much deeper and is more likely to result in a fatally wounded bird.How do y'all think the use of TSS shot has affected the success rate of Turkey hunters? Seems like it has extended the range of most shotguns which has to be impacting the overall kill to some extent. #9 TSS will easily kill out to 50-60 yards. The more dense pattern of the # 9's coupled with the pellet weight equaling that of a #6 lead shot has essentially extended the effective range of most shotguns on the market by 15-20 yards. How many times have you had that ole Tom hang up at 50+ yards and all you could do is sit there and watch him strut around until he just disappears? I now hear stories of people killing turkeys out to 70-80 yards. Where is the sport in that. Technologies like TSS shot and tactics like fanning are taking a toll on turkeys too. If we don't draw a line as to how we harvest turkeys, we are going to have to resort to actions like reducing bag limits and pushing back the start date of season in order keep us from self destructing.
And there you have it!If we don't draw a line as to how we harvest turkeys, we are going to have to resort to actions like reducing bag limits and pushing back the start date of season in order keep us from self destructing.
While I agree with what you're saying, am not sure TSS is making things much worse because some hunters were doing this before TSS. On another hand, when used responsibly, TSS may reduce wounding losses, and does have fewer "flyers" compared to lead.The wound rate and subsequent dead birds from shooting at birds too far with TSS is also a factor. Folks will pop off 60+ yard shots and if they don't get the bird "Oh well, I missed". When in fact, that bird probably has caught a few pellets.
Agree 100% with "when used responsibly"While I agree with what you're saying, am not sure TSS is making things much worse because some hunters were doing this before TSS. On another hand, when used responsibly, TSS may reduce wounding losses, and does have fewer "flyers" compared to lead.
During the quail decline there was a corresponding decline in fur prices which began the trapping decline, a decline in habitat fueled by a rowcrop expansion, the turkey rebound and an increase of use of pesticides and herbicides and an increase in hunting pressure via more hunters and a trend of kennels full of dogs rather than the single dog of hunters past.As an aside, maybe near impossible for many to believe now,
but when I was growing up, quail hunting was by far more popular in Tennessee than is turkey hunting today.
More people quail hunted then, than turkey hunt today.
Am referencing quail here because in many respects, bobwhite quail are very much like a diminutive wild turkey. Quail and quail populations are just more fragile.
Despite that quail fragility, hunters near completely wiped out the wild turkey across Tennessee in the early 1900's, yet the quail populations were robust until at least the 1960's, only majorly declining in the past two or three decades.
Over-hunting had almost nothing to do with the quail decline, and our current turkey decline may also be less effected by hunting than by other factors. Still makes no sense to not take reasonable steps that can't hurt, and should help?
I harvested 2 in 2020, 0 in 2019 and 1 in 2018.You guys are at it again I see. If everyone that is so concerned would go a year or two and not harvest any, maybe that would make a difference. No one is willing to try that on their own.
Happened a few years ago in MS. Treated seed wiped out a flock. Details in this link:During the quail decline there was a corresponding decline in fur prices which began the trapping decline, a decline in habitat fueled by a rowcrop expansion, the turkey rebound and an increase of use of pesticides and herbicides and an increase in hunting pressure via more hunters and a trend of kennels full of dogs rather than the single dog of hunters past.
As a note to this there is a contingent that strongly believes there is a disease involved as well ( I have no knowledge of this ) The reasoning is directed toward the fact that quail have not rebounded except in limited pockets.
Thru burning, leaving edges, allowing native grasses, weeds and forbs thrive as well as year round pressure on predators we are seeing an expansion of quail on one large farm in Western, KY. "Reasonable steps"
Something else to consider on turkey (and other birds) During a recent conversation with a group of land owning hunters and their management people including a couple names I promised not to reveal. There is some concern and belief in another factor not much discussed as to the decline. Most seed is treated and gassed to keep insects and rodents from infesting and consuming the seed. These coatings last anywhere from 6 months to over 2 years depending on the seed type, how much exists in stocks, marketing delivery methods and more. In the hands of the end user there is no oversight but in the hands of the seed companies there is oversight in regards to handling, exposure and disposal due to the chemicals present on large quantities. As an example the seed that is donated to NWTF as wildlife seed would be very expensive to dispose of in bulk that it is cheaper to bag and donate than dispose. A very large quantity of this seed is broadcast rather than planted and is consumed by wildlife with poison intact. Again, not a single cause but certainly could be a factor!
Agreed but how many small farmers use these programs! The facts are that the vast majority of these incentives are consumed by large land holders. Most CRP monies are consumed by large land holders that even lease land for that purpose. Most of these do not manage predators, they only do the minimum required to stay compliant. Many of these programs have been full in recent years and the paperwork, regulations and costs incurred are so that small farmers and recreational land owners are not participating. None of these programs are directed to or limited to small farmers or recreational land owners. CRP requires a recent multi year row crop history. There are many ways we can improve the incentives and better educate land owners and users.Right now there are very good incentives for land managers to improve habitat through the farm bill programs.
Agree.I harvested 2 in 2020 . . . . .
I believe in practicing what I preach.
Haven't limited out since TN went from a 2 bird limit to a 4 bird limit... strictly self imposed, although most of the birds I pass get shot on the neighbors who do not self regulate.You guys are at it again I see. If everyone that is so concerned would go a year or two and not harvest any, maybe that would make a difference. No one is willing to try that on their own.