Thoughts on this one

I know folks don't like using antlers to age a buck, but in my experience 2yr olds don't have tall, well developed brows like that, nor main beams that extend to his nose tip. I was already at 3.5 with the body pics. Now I'm solidly still at 3.5 with antler pics. That there is a great buck with legit potential.
 
One pic looks 2.5, one pic looks 4.5, the rest 3.5... so that's a pretty good average
The man from Mississippi nailed it!

Ignoring the antlers, I would say 3 1/2 or older.
After seeing the antlers, still say that.

I think there is almost 50% odds this one may be 4 1/2.

There are some antler characteristics that do correlate somewhat with age.
Basal Mass in particular.
But what a 3 1/2 or a 4 1/2 typically have varies by region,
so one must know his area.
In most my TN areas, the mass of those antlers correlates most with a 3 1/2.
But if he's in the Cherokee National Forest, perhaps 4 1/2.
President's Island, maybe 2 1/2.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top