Bgoodman30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,862
- Reaction score
- 2,894
And I qoute. "Animals are eating turkeys at an alarming rate and that's affecting their productivity. Period"..
Are hunters considered "animals"? If not, we should be. As a whole, with all the gadgets/props/technology of today, we are the most effective/efficient "killing" hunters to ever hunt/kill the wild turkey.And I qoute. "Animals are eating turkeys at an alarming rate and that's affecting their productivity. Period"..
Guaranteed. You cannot study a somewhat suppressed turkey population in 5 counties and make wholesale far reaching conclusions about statewide turkey population/dynamics. We have 95 counties that span 27M acres, with noticeable land type/land use/climate variances from Memphis to Bristol. One size does not fit all. I love research as much as anyone, and lived it for 15 years at Ames with Dr. Harper and others, but boots on the ground real life hunting experience and year in and year out hunter observations have to be a part of the plan as well. I've seen firsthand what some deer research data "suggested" at times, when the reality for the hunter in the woods was 180° from what was being concluded/conveyed to the masses. My .02I disagree with this some I think its farm specific.
Are hunters considered "animals"? If not, we should be. As a whole, with all the gadgets/props/technology of today, we are the most effective/efficient "killing" hunters to ever hunt/kill the wild turkey.
Guaranteed. You cannot study a somewhat suppressed turkey population in 5 counties and make wholesale far reaching conclusions about statewide turkey population/dynamics. We have 95 counties that span 27M acres, with noticeable land type/land use/climate variances from Memphis to Bristol. One size does not fit all. I love research as much as anyone, and lived it for 15 years at Ames with Dr. Harper and others, but boots on the ground real life hunting experience and year in and year out hunter observations have to be a part of the plan as well. I've seen firsthand what some deer research data "suggested" at times, when the reality for the hunter in the woods was 180° from what was being concluded/conveyed to the masses. My .02
Agree, predators and raptors are out of control in a lot of areas, but that is not going to change for the better any time soon. Predators are a constant, regardless of the month. They do not care about delayed season or no delay. They have one goal, to eat and survive, and will raid/eat a nest in April just as fast they will raid one in July. I do not see the difference.Sure but not what he was talking about. He was talking about specifically about predation. Hunters aren't killing poults or nest.
He said nest success was some of the lowest last year after delay EVER...
Unless this is a new release, pretty sure I listened to it a while back. Do you know if it is hot off the press?I would definitely listen first..
Says 4 days ago.Unless this is a new release, pretty sure I listened to it a while back. Do you know if it is hot off the press?
10-4, will listen in the coming days. Thanks for sharing with the group.Says 4 days ago.
Agree, predators and raptors are out of control in a lot of areas, but that is not going to change for the better any time soon. Predators are a constant, regardless of the month. They do not care about delayed season or no delay. They have one goal, to eat and survive, and will raid/eat a nest in April just as fast they will raid one in July. I do not see the difference.
Racoons for sure.I read all of these findings and wonder what predators are doing the most damage? Also, why has the predator problem gotten so bad as of late. I figure mostly a change in hunters and trappers actions. You do not see many people coon hunting like they did 20 years ago. Also, trapping is not done a lot either.
Are hunters considered "animals"? If not, we should be. As a whole, with all the gadgets/props/technology of today, we are the most effective/efficient "killing" hunters to ever hunt/kill the wild turkey.
Difference as in how the later start date or earlier start has anything to do with predators. Maybe that was not the point, but here is my point about predators as a whole across the State.Not sure what you mean by not seeing a difference? Between hunters and predators?
Difference as in how the later start date or earlier start has anything to do with predators. Maybe that was not the point, but here is my point about predators as a whole across the State.
Predators are a constant and remain a constant UNLESS someone or a team of someones trap feverishly FOREVER. Simply unrealistic in the grand scheme of things. People/hunters are too busy as it is and trapping is not a priority to 99.5% of hunters. When I was in Ames, some researchers from a huge southern plantation briefed us at oiur annual dinner on their coyote trapping research. The bottom line was their hunting club/ plantation paid good money to have dedicated trappers trap for a few years with incredible results for a short period of time. Coyote population declined and the fawn recruitment exploded during that time. Here's the rub: as soon as the funding/trapping stopped, the coyotes moved back in and things were "back to normal" in short order. A very short term expensive improvement that was not sustainable due to the cost.
The statement that there is less gobbling after 5/15 is accurate, however what is gobbling is usually a player
OP you are hell bent against the early opener. Personally I don't know right now it's impact but logically it makes sense to be a positive.
If they move the season up a week we will be flooded with OOS hunters because as of right now we don't open any earlier than their home states
If they move the season up a week we will be flooded with OOS hunters because as of right now we don't open any earlier than their home states