Southern Sportsman
Well-Known Member
Wes Parrish":1o322uuh said:I really don't think it has anything to do with cost. However, it seems there may be fewer "fliers", and by going to smaller shot (such as a #7 rather than a #6), you can still get dense patterns with pellets that penetrate farther. A #7 Fed HWT has penetration comparable to a #5 copper-plated lead pellet, actually even greater at longer ranges.Uncle Jesse":1o322uuh said:I always figured it was to keep cost a little lower too. The first Remington Hevi shells I bought were 3.5 1 7/8 ounce loads. I felt a little let down knowing that was fewer pellets than 1 7/8 of the same size lead and a lot less than the 2 ounce loads I had been using.Wes Parrish":1o322uuh said:One more thing: I know the "reason" has to do with the wads, but it still makes no sense to me that Federal can get 1 1/2 ounce of their HWT pellets in a 3" 20ga shell, yet they can only get 1 7/8 ounce in a 3 1/2" 12ga shell?
More recently, I've started using the Federal HWT in the 12 gauges. Even though it only has 1 7/8 oz of #7's, they hit a whole lot harder than those #7's in other "factory" loads. I'm not getting hardly as dense a pattern as with 2 1/4 oz MagBlends, but believe the HWT is every bit as good a long range load, while providing noticeably less recoil --- something I really notice with the 12's. Lots of good choices with a 12, but with the 20 gauge, Federal has really trumped their competition.
The 'hevi shot" is 12 g/cc in density so just slightly heavier than lead (10-11 g/cc). The heavyweight shot used by federal is 15 g/cc. It doesn't sound like much but the Fed loads are nearly twice as dense as lead. While I sincerely question the effectiveness of a single "hevishot" number 7 pellet at 50 yards (especially given their piss poor quality control in pellet size), no doubt the Fed 7s are deadly at that range.