First orda of biness
Active Member
Plus, thousands of acres of habitat have been lost.10-15 years ago the seasons started just as early, but there were a pot fewer people hunting and it was a lot harder to kill a turkey.
Plus, thousands of acres of habitat have been lost.10-15 years ago the seasons started just as early, but there were a pot fewer people hunting and it was a lot harder to kill a turkey.
I feel confident saying that the percent removed/percent standing is WAY WAY out of proportion for a thriving resource. I would also say a large percentage of that is due to decoy use early in the season in fields. What used to be a rare kill is now routine because of decoys.I just spoke with Roger Shields, thanked him for his efforts and inquired about this sentence that really concerned me:
"Adult and youth hunters combined harvested an estimated 57,633 turkeys (49,083 ± 4,725 adult gobblers, 7,946 ± 1,596 jakes, and 604 ± 400 bearded hens)."
We talked for 30 minutes on the phone. Long story short, Roger has a lot of confidence that the Statewide harvest (take from the resource) was more near 55-57k, rather than the REPORTED 40k. He went on to say with confidence that TN and other southern states reported harvest is only 70% of the ACTUAL HARVEST, so we are in line with neighboring states. He specifically mentioned Kentucky and I believe Georgia. The number in and of itself (55-57k) is not as concerning to him as the "percent take" from the standing population preseason (# removed versus # standing preseason). He said TWRA is trying to get a firmer estimate of the standing population of the statewide preseason turkey population, as well as each Region, and if it is ever deemed we are over-harvesting, a recommendation to the Commission to reduce bag limits will be forthcoming IF IT IS WARRANTED AND SUPPORTED with science and data, and not a knee jerk reaction. He clearly stated a good estimate of the preseason standing population is the piece of data we are missing, or have the least amount of confidence in at this point in time. He eluded to the fact the banded turkey research that will shed some light on how impactful the hunter harvest or over-harvest is. That is a four year study and will give him another piece of critical information about hunter harvest impact to the resource.
Super super nice and humble fellow that I could talk to all day. If nothing more, send him an email and thank him for his efforts toward these reports.
Agreed. But from Roger's perspective, he currently has no "hard data" to go on to make a scientific recommendation to the Commission, so we cannot expect someone such as himself to make a wholesale recommendation based on a few unsatisfied hunters in Region 1, when he has just as many fat and happy hunters in Region 2. He acknowledged the variation in geography and landscape across the State and eluded to the fact that managing the resource at the Region level may very well be needed in out years. Again, he is strictly a public servant with limited staff, resources and funding, so he can only make recommendations based on the science and facts at his fingertips, which he is still compiling, albeit slower than many of us would prefer. We cannot blame him for years of perceived mismanagement before he came onboard.That's all fine and good Andy, but it seems to me that TWRA's response to wildlife problems is always reactive rather than proactive and driven by the desire to prevent a decrease in license sales, especially to non-residents.
Agree.We cannot blame him for years of perceived mismanagement before he came onboard.
Personally, I have historically killed one less than the limit (in TN), kinda "saving" that last bird, just so can enjoy continuing to hunt and/or just having that opportunity to go.How many of us are willing to only kill one bird this year? Self regulation.
How many of us are willing to only kill one bird this year? Self regulation. I wonder how many of the guys yellin the loudest on here are the guys that kill a limit every year and maybe only target the biggest most dominant Toms?
That actually sounds more like it could have been aflatoxin poisoning?I went from normal population numbers in November to next to nothing in March...this was 2017.
How many of us are willing to only kill one bird this year? Self regulation. I wonder how many of the guys yellin the loudest on here are the guys that kill a limit every year and maybe only target the biggest most dominant Toms?
Yes that's what I think happened.That actually sounds more like it could have been aflatoxin poisoning?
This could especially be the case if the hen numbers were also greatly diminished.
Would not bother me if decoys were eliminated from the scene so I am with you . Also would not bother me if the limit was two birds but that is just me . Whatever the case , I do not want to lose the beautiful birds . As a 64 year old , these birds would have changed my life drastically as I grew up . They have been a joy for me the last 20 plus years . They are definitely habit forming .This is all so dam simple. We have a few choices at the moment. First it is a known fact there are more hunters killing more birds than ever before. Second, we have tactics now that make killing birds far easier than it's ever been In the history of this sport.
First the elimination of the tactics that make killing turkeys far too easy especially for the the inexperienced and lazy hunters need to be removed. This could save thousands upon thousands of birds each year. Leaving those birds in the flock only benefits the future of our sport. This alone is the easiest and less painful for all.
If we don't do that, what's next 2 week long seasons with a 1 bird limit? No hunting after Noon? No jakes?
it's baffling to me that the decoy fairies are so tied to this tactic that they cannot fathom hunting without them. The shear idea is terrifying and sends them into a fall in the floor fit.
If any of the tactics I employ were eliminated I'd adjust and learn a new way. This isn't the case for the decoy fairies or DF's from now on.
so what's it going to be? Lose the decoys or lose most of our season and limit?
No one can deny that there isn't something horrible happening, and just sitting back watching it unfold isn't acceptable
very interesting!probably not just one thing but many factors have contributed to decline
My family and I have been avid Turkey hunters since the seasons were open in Tn and I've been involved with twra and nwtf since early 80s
I'll share with you some info that might explain some of what we have experienced
regarding reducing the limits during twra meeting
Only 67 emails were received out of 25000 successful hunters wanting to reduce the limits .
Complaining on forums or face book have little value
the biologist that has been quoted about hens not breeding was called by twra it was an opinionhis , no data to support
the reason the season is so long is when it was set decades ago , my friend Jack Murray was the state Turkey coordinator, he didn't not want to miss the peak goblin season which he thought could vary as much a couple weeks per year
This same population decline happened in the 70s and 8os , Jack said some of the original stockings were ms strain birds and he felt that they were not pure (mostly 31/32) some of the original counties stocked boomed and had big flocks and then busted .
his goal was to restock with missouri strain birds (Lbl)
Which caused the population to explode across Tn with the stocking efforts
Plus he said they gobbled more .
Strictly from memory as it's been 35 years since I was part of that nwtf group with Jack Murrayvery interesting!
any idea which parts of the state were stocked with Mississippi birds and which were stocked with Missouri birds? Im sure my farms in middle TN were from Missouri lineage, they look and act totally different from the birds I've encountered in south MS.