We have a winnerAll about the money.
We have a winnerAll about the money.
I am very positive it DID NOT start at Ames.Are you saying this started at Ames?
I've heard this before and I know several agree that its about the money and certainly anytime the government is involved "the money" comes into the conversation.All about the money.
How can you possibly be VERY POSITIVE? No body can be VERY POSITIVE. I am VERY POSITIVE that if Ames is ground zero it should be the center of the investigation even if it didnt start there. The only way to be VERY POSITIVE it did not start at Ames is to be VERY POSITIVE about where it did start.I am very positive it DID NOT start at Ames.
Fair point, but I think scn is alluding to the fact Ames did not import "breeder bucks" or any other deer, thus he's very positive it was not introduced at Ames by selfish short sighted human behavior. No one can be VERY POSITIVE "Ames is ground zero". Ames, like hundreds of other unfortunate tracts, is covered by all of the positive dots shown below. Worth mentioning, the majority of Ames owned land (80%) is in Fayette county (2nd highest prevalence rate in TN), not Hardeman (highest prevalence rate).How can you possibly be VERY POSITIVE? No body can be VERY POSITIVE. I am VERY POSITIVE that if Ames is ground zero it should be the center of the investigation even if it didnt start there. The only way to be VERY POSITIVE it did not start at Ames is to be VERY POSITIVE about where it did start.
People alluding that it started at Ames because Ames is a research facility are way off. I think everybody in that area has a very good idea where it came from. But, without sufficient evidence to go to court, nothing can be said due to libel issues.How can you possibly be VERY POSITIVE? No body can be VERY POSITIVE. I am VERY POSITIVE that if Ames is ground zero it should be the center of the investigation even if it didnt start there. The only way to be VERY POSITIVE it did not start at Ames is to be VERY POSITIVE about where it did start.
I wasnt alluding that it came from Ames because it is a research facility. I have other suspicions that may or may not be true just like everybody else. And, just because scn says on TN Deer doesn't make it so. If everybody knows where it came from, somebody needs to tell. If they KNOW, there is no libel. I have my ideas, but I don't know. As severely as this issue is affecting the hunters in Tennessee, they deserve to know if anybody knows. Especially the older ones who sacrificed and contributed to the sport while the herd was being built. These may not be around to see the end result of CWD. If Ames Plantation with all their wealth and political connections is not responsible or partially responsible the people at Ames deserve their name cleared.People alluding that it started at Ames because Ames is a research facility are way off. I think everybody in that area knows where it came from. But, without sufficient evidence to go to court, nothing can be said due to libel issues.
And, none of those folks would be saying Ames...........
How do you propose to clear anybody's name?I wasnt alluding that it came from Ames because it is a research facility. I have other suspicions that may or may not be true just like everybody else. And, just because scn says on TN Deer doesn't make it so. If everybody knows where it came from, somebody needs to tell. If they KNOW, there is no libel. I have my ideas, but I don't know. As severely as this issue is affecting the hunters in Tennessee, they deserve to know if anybody knows. Especially the older ones who sacrificed and contributed to the sport while the herd was being built. These may not be around to see the end result of CWD. If Ames Plantation with all their wealth and political connections is not responsible or partially responsible the people at Ames deserve their name cleared.
I've heard this before and I know several agree that its about the money and certainly anytime the government is involved "the money" comes into the conversation.
But in the case of CWD....TWRA is paying for all the testing and listening to several folks on here...the guidelines are not necessarily drawing more people towards hunting but pushing more folks away....and for sure if they achieve their goal and reduce deer numbers greatly...you can bet over time less people will be hunting....all this combined would equal less income generated...not more?
But maybe I'm missing something?
Agree...and I'm not pushing any conspiracy theory at all....I'm saying that I hear that its all "about the money" but I dont understand? What money? If anything CWD is costing TWRA money...less people hunting now with less people hunting in the future along with more and more CWD testing.CWD is an incredibly complex issue that sadly isn't well understood yet by science. We can conspiracy theory and point fingers and criticize because the decisions aren't ours to make. And to be quite honest I don't think I'd want that responsibility. I'm not a fan of how TWRA is handling it but I sure don't want to trade places with them.
No, the taxpayers are paying for all the testing. The government doesn't have any money that isn't yours.I've heard this before and I know several agree that its about the money and certainly anytime the government is involved "the money" comes into the conversation.
But in the case of CWD....TWRA is paying for all the testing.....
I understand that the government doesnt generate income and that taxpayers foot the bill for everything that the government does. But in this case TWRA, who is funded by license sales, is giving away $75 vouchers for processing fee's and in some cases even giving away Sportsman license...both in addition to all of the CWD testing...all of which cost money...allot of money.No, the taxpayers are paying for all the testing. The government doesn't have any money that isn't yours.
There is plenty of Grant money to be had. Especially since they are trying to keep it out of the elk heard in Tn.Agree...and I'm not pushing any conspiracy theory at all....I'm saying that I hear that its all "about the money" but I dont understand? What money? If anything CWD is costing TWRA money...less people hunting now with less people hunting in the future along with more and more CWD testing.
Grant money to cover cost of testing and research makes sense....but in the end, after all the smoke clears, I cant see how CWD could be financially benifical to the Agency?There is plenty of Grant money to be had. Especially since they are trying to keep it out of the elk heard in Tn.
What grant money? You think it exists or should, or you know it does and can provide a link?There is plenty of Grant money to be had. Especially since they are trying to keep it out of the elk heard in Tn.
It's really easy to just throw out "follow the money" and then nobody ever follows the money... because there's no money to followGrant money to cover cost of testing and reasearch makes sense....but in the end, after all the smoke clears, I cant see how CWD could be financially benifical to the Agency?
The conspiracy theory of it all being "about the money" doesnt add up to me?
Grant money to cover cost of testing and reasearch makes sense....but in the end, after all the smoke clears, I cant see how CWD could be financially benifical to the Agency?
The conspiracy theory of it all being "about the money" doesnt add up to me?