Smo
Well-Known Member
It seems everyone nowadays wants too take the easy way out…
Bow hunting went from a stick & string too cables & wheels and then on too crossbows and now I guess air bows just too give the hunter every advantage and extending the kill range of their weapon..
Muzzleloading Season has followed in much the same direction..
Advancement in ignition systems, sabots vs patches, bullets vs roundball, modern scopes vs traditional iron sights and now electronic ignition!
There again all to extend the hunters effective range and more effectively give them the advantage over traditional style muzzle loader and their quarry.
I attribute more lost deer too the hunter taking shots at ranges much further than they are capable of making clean kill shots..
Mostly due too the advancement of the so called "primitive weapons " which both the bow & muzzleloaders are.
Tracking a wounded deer is tough work, especially when the leaves are still on!
The last deer I lost , 1 of 3 in 50 years of hunting…I was within 20 yards of where I found the carcass a week later…,I just simply could not see the deer because the cover was so thick in the area..
Still the deer was found < 250 yards from where it was shot.
Would I have recovered the deer had I bought in a dog ? Most likely, but then the dog could have pushed the deer off my property never too be seen again without trespassing or jumping thru a bunch of hoops contacting the surrounding land owners..
But I would never consider bringing in a dog until I had done an extensive ground search of the area.
Bow & arrows and Muzzleloaders were not meant too be long range weapons…
I find it much more enjoyable too hunt tight secluded areas and get up close a personable with the game vs shooting one 250 yards away , but that's just me.
Rant over, Dang, I feel better now!
Bow hunting went from a stick & string too cables & wheels and then on too crossbows and now I guess air bows just too give the hunter every advantage and extending the kill range of their weapon..
Muzzleloading Season has followed in much the same direction..
Advancement in ignition systems, sabots vs patches, bullets vs roundball, modern scopes vs traditional iron sights and now electronic ignition!
There again all to extend the hunters effective range and more effectively give them the advantage over traditional style muzzle loader and their quarry.
I attribute more lost deer too the hunter taking shots at ranges much further than they are capable of making clean kill shots..
Mostly due too the advancement of the so called "primitive weapons " which both the bow & muzzleloaders are.
Tracking a wounded deer is tough work, especially when the leaves are still on!
The last deer I lost , 1 of 3 in 50 years of hunting…I was within 20 yards of where I found the carcass a week later…,I just simply could not see the deer because the cover was so thick in the area..
Still the deer was found < 250 yards from where it was shot.
Would I have recovered the deer had I bought in a dog ? Most likely, but then the dog could have pushed the deer off my property never too be seen again without trespassing or jumping thru a bunch of hoops contacting the surrounding land owners..
But I would never consider bringing in a dog until I had done an extensive ground search of the area.
Bow & arrows and Muzzleloaders were not meant too be long range weapons…
I find it much more enjoyable too hunt tight secluded areas and get up close a personable with the game vs shooting one 250 yards away , but that's just me.
Rant over, Dang, I feel better now!