i wish they would
some places i would some i would not
some places i would some i would not
Man that is terrible logic and reasoning. The bullet is bait???? What????The hook and bait are equivalent to the gun and bullet in my opinion. The corn would be the same as a single brush pile in a 40 acre pond.
I thought you planted corn for the deer on your place? If so then I don't understand why deer would leave your place to go eat at the neighbors corn pileBaiting in Tennessee. Old,crazy topic.I know many are opposed,like my friend BSK for biological reasons.Some are opposed because of diseases spread.OK,salt licks must not spread them. Here are my reasons for wanting baiting to be allowed in Tennessee. 1. I have 350 acres and I do not bait during season,but I do for pictures and see multiple deer ,does multiple bucks that are shooters for me.Once season starts,those deer are no longer seen,unless its a small buck cruising and being stupid.I went on 16 hunts this season and never saw more than 5 deer on any hunt unless it was a small buck.I know that my neighbors pull them over the line with corn.And I know they shoot them,I have a picture from this year.So,I dont break the law and the neighbor does and he gets the benefit and I just get tired.Got it. 2. I go hunt with a friend in Kentucky and both hunts see 10-12 deer and shooters both hunts.Corn there all year and thats what brought them out of the thicket.3.Gamewardens wouldnt get any more calls about baiting if it was legal.They could chase the guys that do illegal things.4. I can only kill two bucks,why care how I do it.Who cares if the buck came out because the girlfriend was eating corn from a feeder.Please TWRA,just end this deal and make it legal to pour out a bag of corn.You can buy a bag during deer season at our local grocery store.
Actually, it's terrible logic to compare fishing with live bait to hunting over corn.... But I was playing along with your game...Man that is terrible logic and reasoning. The bullet is bait???? What????
You really should go and study a dictionary to understand and comprehend the true meaning of words. According to most of the other posts on this thread, corn does not attract deer says the hunters. And by the way, when I stop at the local bait shop before going fishing, I buy minnows, worms or crickets for BAIT. Once again words have meanings, learn them before making yourself look uneducated.Actually, it's terrible logic to compare fishing with live bait to hunting over corn.... But I was playing along with your game...
Here is my thinking if you wish to dispel... You say corn is the bait just like the minnow on your hook crappie fishing. I disagree. The hook and minnow are the tools you use to remove the fish from the water, just the like the gun and bullet. A minnow does not attract fish, it gets them to bite but if you throw a minnow out on a hook that is a half a mile from the nearest crappie, you aren't going to suddenly attract crappie from great distances. Conversely, if you put out a pile of corn, you'll have deer travel great distances and consistently revisit the area for a bite to eat. Now, if you place a brush pile(corn) in an otherwise barren area, all you'll need is a hook and a minnow(or perhaps a rifle in the case of deer) to catch them.
BTW, I think if you bite both of your apples, one will taste like an orange
That's your argument? That I am uneducated and should read a dictionary? Ha! Have a good day.You really should go and study a dictionary to understand and comprehend the true meaning of words. According to most of the other posts on this thread, corn does not attract deer says the hunters. And by the way, when I stop at the local bait shop before going fishing, I buy minnows, worms or crickets for BAIT. Once again words have meanings, learn them before making yourself look uneducated.
Good Logic and Reasoning always exposes your fallacy of a point. BTW, I don't bite apples, I do use my large banana to destroy some tacos though. Jokes on you !!!That's your argument? That I am uneducated and should read a dictionary? Ha! Have a good day.
Logic and reasoning tell me that you are correct.BTW, I think if you bite both of your apples, one will taste like an orange
And on you...Logic and reasoning tell me that you are correct.
Ski, please explain how the"Semantics" of hunting vs fishing is ridiculous. My very simple point at the beginning was that to use bait in one sport and not refer to it as the same thing in another does not hold water in an argument using Logic and reason. Minnows, crickets or worms for fishing AND Apples, Corn or whatever for deer hunting is the SAME THING. It is irrational to argue that they are different. I have gotten an appreciation of different hunters on here and there thoughts of hunting over corn- "bait"The semantics game of fishing vs. hunting is ridiculous, IMO. Fishing is fishing. Hunting is hunting. Conflating the two unnecessarily distracts from a direct exchange of perspectives.
Baiting absolutely works. Feeding, not as much. There's a difference. It's a tactic like any other and if used properly in the right context, it's dynamite. Or if used wrongly can be a dud. On a well managed property with plenty of food already available, especially in variety, baiting is going to be less of a draw. In an environment where it's the easiest food source then heck yeah the deer will hammer it. If it's a feeder with persistent, predictable production then it becomes like a plot where mature bucks only come after dark. But throw out a random bag of corn in an area where deer aren't used to it, and they'll compete to get it. Context is everything.
I could care less one way or the other. I personally don't care for it but I certainly don't push my beliefs on anybody else or think ill of somebody who disagrees with me. But to say it's an ineffective tactic is ridiculous. Even here in midTN pallet loads of deer corn are sold at Wal-Mart every season. Nobody's buying all that corn if they're not killing deer over it. Not only is it an expense, but it's also a risk of trouble with the law. Hardly worth the expense & trouble for an ineffective tactic. It works. That's why people break the law to do it.
good postThe semantics game of fishing vs. hunting is ridiculous, IMO. Fishing is fishing. Hunting is hunting. Conflating the two unnecessarily distracts from a direct exchange of perspectives.
Baiting absolutely works. Feeding, not as much. There's a difference. It's a tactic like any other and if used properly in the right context, it's dynamite. Or if used wrongly can be a dud. On a well managed property with plenty of food already available, especially in variety, baiting is going to be less of a draw. In an environment where it's the easiest food source then heck yeah the deer will hammer it. If it's a feeder with persistent, predictable production then it becomes like a plot where mature bucks only come after dark. But throw out a random bag of corn in an area where deer aren't used to it, and they'll compete to get it. Context is everything.
I could care less one way or the other. I personally don't care for it but I certainly don't push my beliefs on anybody else or think ill of somebody who disagrees with me. But to say it's an ineffective tactic is ridiculous. Even here in midTN pallet loads of deer corn are sold at Wal-Mart every season. Nobody's buying all that corn if they're not killing deer over it. Not only is it an expense, but it's also a risk of trouble with the law. Hardly worth the expense & trouble for an ineffective tactic. It works. That's why people break the law to do it.