HOOK
Well-Known Member
I and tired of getting smacked between the eyes with my Muzzleloader. My scope is as far forward as I can get it. I'm looking for an extender for a Thompson Center Impact 50 cal . Any suggestions?
It's a TC Impact. It has a short stock. I'm not sure if a slip on will work because of the butt configuration.Not sure about an extender but what scope do you have. Sounds like it has really short eye relief maybe?
I shoot 777 100 gr. I won't go less.I shoot 350 gr. Maxi-Hunters in my CVA Staghorn .50 caliber. I started out with 90 gr. Triple 7. I don't think it was a really hot load but, in a 7 lb. rifle it would almost come out of your hands. I dropped down to 80 gr.
i shoot 777 100 gr. Won't go less.I shoot 350 gr. Maxi-Hunters in my CVA Staghorn .50 caliber. I started out with 90 gr. Triple 7. I don't think it was a really hot load but, in a 7 lb. rifle it would almost come out of your hands. I dropped down to 80 gr.
100 gr. granular with Maxi- Hunters?It's a TC Impact. It has a short stock. I'm not sure if a slip on will work because of the butt configuration.
I shoot 777 100 gr. I won't go less.
i shoot 777 100 gr. Won't go less.
Are you talking to me or who? Years ago I had a T/C New Englander .50 caliber. I used 90 gr. Pyrodex RS. with 370 gr. Maxi - Balls and Maxi - Hunters. Pyrodex is not as powerful as Triple 7. It wasn't bad at all on recoil. But, the Triple 7 and 350 gr. are a whole new ball game. Lighter rifle too with the Staghorn too. I've shot 100 gr. granulated Triple 7 with 240 gr. XTP before and it's not bad.Sounds like you need a slip on pad and a scope with longer eye clearance....or a new gun.
Whoever owns the gun looking to solve his eye relief issue!Are you talking to me or who? Years ago I had a T/C New Englander .50 caliber. I used 90 gr. Pyrodex RS. with 370 gr. Maxi - Balls and Maxi - Hunters. Pyrodex is not as powerful as Triple 7. It wasn't bad at all on recoil. But, the Triple 7 and 350 gr. are a whole new ball game. Lighter rifle too with the Staghorn too. I've shot 100 gr. granulated Triple 7 with 240 gr. XTP before and it's not bad.
If the picture you attached is your gun, it looks like your scope is way too far back. Can you let us see a pic of the whole gun so we can see how the rings and mounts are? Just with that little piece, it looks odd to me.It's a TC Impact. It has a short stock. I'm not sure if a slip on will work because of the butt configuration.
I shoot 777 100 gr. I won't go less.
i shoot 777 100 gr. Won't go less.
The scope is as far forward as it will go. Just picked up a slip on limbsaver at Wally World. Fits fine. Problem solved.If the picture you attached is your gun, it looks like your scope is way too far back. Can you let us see a pic of the whole gun so we can see how the rings and mounts are? Just with that little piece, it looks odd to me.
Ok, not me.Whoever owns the gun looking to solve his eye relief issue!
I was thinking something more along the lines of maybe the rings/mount could be backwards, sloped to the rear instead of sloped forward. But if the pad fixed the issue, all is good.The scope is as far forward as it will go. Just picked up a slip on limbsaver at Wally World. Fits fine. Problem solved.
Yeah, now that mentioned that, I agree with you. If the butt stock is longer, it will cause the shooter to tilt their head lower to get a sight picture. Does not sound like a real solution.I have never experimented with this, but most of my scopes need to be a distance of "X" for me to have a good sight picture. How is changing the butt stock length going to change that value?