BSK
Well-Known Member
On that, you would be correct sir!Something tells me science has very little to do with it....
On that, you would be correct sir!Something tells me science has very little to do with it....
Interesting.The water quality credits pay much better.
I don't know but I would if it was younger trees. I only have 400-500 an acre in most of what I own so I'd call it a win at thatThis might work because it's not mature enough harvest yet anyway. But I wonder if the timber has to be a certain age before it can be enrolled. Acres of saplings can't be possibly be consuming much carbon when compared to a stand of mature timber.
But you make a good point; if they'll enroll ANY timber stand, I can see where the landowner might have a win+win. CC for 25yrs + a timber thin in yr 26.