BamaProud
Well-Known Member
Most likely. Unless there is additional chaos in the top 10 over the upcoming weeks.
Cincinnati or Oklahoma?
- Thread starter PalsPal
- Start date
Most likely. Unless there is additional chaos in the top 10 over the upcoming weeks.
PillsburyDoughboy
Well-Known Member
All these people looking for ALABAMA to lose so they can win. Hilarious. You just have to win your games to win a Natty. Just that simple.
If the committee were to put a 2 loss alabammer team in instead of a 1 loss Oregon, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, etc. people would riot in the street. 
I agree and if Alabama has 2 losses I still think they're capable of winning it all as bad as that pains me to say. They're not as dominate as in recent years but still be hard to bet against them.
BamaProud
Well-Known Member
If the committee were to put a 2 loss alabammer team in instead of a 1 loss Oregon, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, etc. people would riot in the street.
Some people would be furious for sure, but most people understand that is about way more than Wins and Loses.
buckaroo
Well-Known Member
No most people would be furious
Keep thinking that way
!There has been a push to make it a prerequisite that if you don't win your conference, you don't get in, and I agree with that.
Why do you think that there is now such a hurry to expand the playoffs? It's not to allow the little guys to get in, it's to allow more teams from the same conference.
huntintn
Well-Known Member
After Tennessee upsets Georgia the playoffs will really be in a mess.
Here's a scenario. TN does beat GA. Then GA beats Bama in an ugly 10-7 type game. All the while A&M starts looking better and better. Who then deserves to go
?
BamaProud
Well-Known Member
Keep thinking that way
There has been a push to make it a prerequisite that if you don't win your conference, you don't get in, and I agree with that.
Why do you think that there is now such a hurry to expand the playoffs? It's not to allow the little guys to get in, it's to allow more teams from the same conference.
Can't have it both ways. That won' work when we go to a 16 team playoff. It should be the best 4 or 8 or 16... teams no matter their Wins or Losses of c'ships. Simply the best.
TN of course!Here's a scenario. TN does beat GA. Then GA beats Bama in an ugly 10-7 type game. All the while A&M starts looking better and better. Who then deserves to go
huntintn
Well-Known Member
Or Baylor beats Oklahoma
BamaProud
Well-Known Member
<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/hPPx8yk3Bmqys" width="480" height="435" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="">via GIPHY</a></p>
Mescalero
Well-Known Member
Sweet!
I damn give a damn about alabama.
PillsburyDoughboy
Well-Known Member
The feelings run mutual. The whole vols beating the dawgs did not work out . Baylor Beat Oklahoma and ALABAMA is still in contention for a natty. Yall keep wishing in one hand every week. Keep up the good work. Gonna need some more group text imma thinking.
buckaroo
Well-Known Member
Do you realize bama has pretty much played one of weakest strength of scheduled in sec, lost to a&m, nearly lost to gators and LSU and your ranked ahead of others much more worthy? Reality will set in soon
TraumaSlave
Well-Known Member
Cincinnati has 1 quality win, ND. They are impressive but, I don't think they compare to the rest. I was born and raised in the naughty Nati. Spent a lot of time on and around campus. Rooting for them every week. I think a 1 loss team like Michigan deserves the spot more. If, and that's a big if, Michigan beats those Nutz, the should be in. I really think they have a chance. GO BLUE!!!
Or... Cincinnati can't help it if the rest of their conference stinks.
