• Help Support TNDeer:

Florida Received A Gift

darn2ten said:
Wrangler95 said:
gator-n-buck said:
encore06 said:
BamaProud said:
encore06 said:
BamaProud said:
I have no dog in this fight, but the SEC reviewed it and agreed with the call.
NO. The SEC did not agree with the call. What they agreed with was the process the refs used; looking at the clock when it reached zero, THEN looking to see if the fall was in motion. The process was correct, the call was not.

Here's the statement. No where does it say they made the wrong call. It affirms their process of determining if a flag was needed or not. They determined one was not needed.

�At the request of the University of Kentucky, consistent with SEC protocol, the conference office reviewed the fourth down play in the first overtime of the Kentucky-Florida game and has determined the officials applied the proper mechanics and guidelines that are in place to determine when a flag should be thrown for delay of game,� the statement read. �The back judge is responsible for delay of game calls. The procedure for the back judge is for his eyes to stay on the clock when it nears zero. When the clock hits zero, he immediately looks from the clock to the ball. If the ball is moving, there is no delay of game. If the ball is stationary, a delay of game penalty is called.�
Like I said, the correct process was made, i.e. " determined the officials applied the proper mechanics and guidelines that are in place to determine when a flag should be thrown for delay of game". The SEC neither agreed, nor disagreed with the call. Look at it like this, an attempted forward pass occurs when the ball is in the QB hand, and his arm is moving forward. The correct mechanic and procedure is determined by; 1( the QB has control of the ball, and 2) his arm is moving forward. All of us have seen plays were we agree, or disagreed with the refs judgement either on the field, or in the booth. It doesn't matter whether the correct call was made, if in the opinion of the SEC, the correct mechanic and procedure was applied.

That's all I have to say on the matter. It is my right to believe and your right to disagree. In the end, its just a ball game, and deer season opens in 10 days. :D

I like the call so it has to be correct... :D Yes hunting season is close.... :)

Was a good game and UT fans might want to rethink an easy win against the Kat's


Just because Kentucky really beat Florida,does not mean they can beat Tennessee.Go Vols!!
Don't know how you figure Kentucky beat Fl. Once again, if a flag would have been thrown for delay of game that would not have ended the game. They would have backed it up 5 yards and lined up again. How do you you know they wouldn't of scored then too?


How do you know they would score.I think Kentucky got a bad call that cost them the game!
 
Wrangler95 said:
darn2ten said:
Wrangler95 said:
gator-n-buck said:
encore06 said:
BamaProud said:
encore06 said:
BamaProud said:
I have no dog in this fight, but the SEC reviewed it and agreed with the call.
NO. The SEC did not agree with the call. What they agreed with was the process the refs used; looking at the clock when it reached zero, THEN looking to see if the fall was in motion. The process was correct, the call was not.

Here's the statement. No where does it say they made the wrong call. It affirms their process of determining if a flag was needed or not. They determined one was not needed.

�At the request of the University of Kentucky, consistent with SEC protocol, the conference office reviewed the fourth down play in the first overtime of the Kentucky-Florida game and has determined the officials applied the proper mechanics and guidelines that are in place to determine when a flag should be thrown for delay of game,� the statement read. �The back judge is responsible for delay of game calls. The procedure for the back judge is for his eyes to stay on the clock when it nears zero. When the clock hits zero, he immediately looks from the clock to the ball. If the ball is moving, there is no delay of game. If the ball is stationary, a delay of game penalty is called.�
Like I said, the correct process was made, i.e. " determined the officials applied the proper mechanics and guidelines that are in place to determine when a flag should be thrown for delay of game". The SEC neither agreed, nor disagreed with the call. Look at it like this, an attempted forward pass occurs when the ball is in the QB hand, and his arm is moving forward. The correct mechanic and procedure is determined by; 1( the QB has control of the ball, and 2) his arm is moving forward. All of us have seen plays were we agree, or disagreed with the refs judgement either on the field, or in the booth. It doesn't matter whether the correct call was made, if in the opinion of the SEC, the correct mechanic and procedure was applied.

That's all I have to say on the matter. It is my right to believe and your right to disagree. In the end, its just a ball game, and deer season opens in 10 days. :D

I like the call so it has to be correct... :D Yes hunting season is close.... :)

Was a good game and UT fans might want to rethink an easy win against the Kat's


Just because Kentucky really beat Florida,does not mean they can beat Tennessee.Go Vols!!
Don't know how you figure Kentucky beat Fl. Once again, if a flag would have been thrown for delay of game that would not have ended the game. They would have backed it up 5 yards and lined up again. How do you you know they wouldn't of scored then too?


How do you know they would score.I think Kentucky got a bad call that cost them the game!
Guess the same way you figure they wouldn't. One things for certain, when it was all played out and done it was Gators 36 - Wildcats 30! :)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top