HB 1618

Reckon they can sell all the WMA's nobody to manage them, everybody can hunt their 100 ac and be happy not having to travel to hunt, reckon won't be no need to have license either, no need to pay merchants ti sell them yep states going to save a lot of cash
 
DoubleRidge said:
Has this become a competition for you? When discussing if baiting should be legal or not please explain why its important for you to know how much land I own
Click to expand...
its not a competition. just answer the question!! i just wanna know if You are paying $1000's of dollars tax money every year to let the state who gets said dollars tell you what to do??
 
turkey32 said:
its not a competition. just answer the question!! i just wanna know if You are paying $1000's of dollars tax money every year to let the state who gets said dollars tell you what to do??
Click to expand...
Yes...I'm paying $1000's in taxes for the farm where I live. Its in greenbelt for agriculture and our family farm also requires $1,000's in taxes...and its in greenbelt for forestry....but we dont pay taxes "to let the state yell us what to do" (whatever that means?) We pay taxes because its the law...And again, the conversation is about...should baiting for deer and swine be legal? Not who pays what in taxes or who owns how much land? I think baiting is a bad idea...you think its a good idea because you pay taxes...and believe it or not, I understand your argument and stance on property owners rights...but honestly what you or I pay in property taxes doesnt define whats best for wildlife.
 
Looks like it was already voted on and passed maybe looking at that link, not sure if it has to have all of them vote or a majority
 
Here's who voted for it most were republicans, the Democrats tried to stop it looks like
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0468.webp
    IMG_0468.webp
    97.1 KB

Latest posts

Back
Top