MidTennFisher
Well-Known Member
That's why when these R3 supporting non-profits as well as hunting companies, hunting influencers, and the like keep saying "hunting is conservation" and we need to recruit more hunters to keep funding conservation, I call BS on that. Hunting is consumption. Preserving access is conservation.I agree with you but nothing can be done about it. That's the worst thing. When I was a kid I used to hunt in spring hill in 2 spots there's a thousand houses sitting there now. So much so it's moving down towards where I live and land is selling for 20 plus k. So either way it's getting ridiculous no matter who is doing it. They aren't making more of it and it's become in crazy high demand. Wild times at the end of the day. Not only that what's not getting talked about and I hate to bring him up, but seek one and what he is doing. Public land getting ridiculously overcrowded. You will see stupid prices paid for little to no land to hunt on in these neighborhoods and you will see an increase I'm arrows in deer and wounded deer in these Suburban areas. It's coming from all sides.
Very few individuals in those categories do a thing to preserve access to hunting land. The ones that do are doing so little in that arena compared to the damage they do that it's negligible. Put it this way, they've done a lot more to increase crowding on public land, and increase the leasing of land, than they've done to acquire more public land.