She keeps trying even though every organization,Police dept.,St Attorney and Judge keeps dismissing her claims.She and her attorneys keep lying and changing their stories and this is her last attempt to try and get money. She tried extorsion and that didnt work either. Now she claims she was kidnaped. She needs to go back to her trailer park and get on with her life.darn2ten":3k89nqnh said:
Jcalder":3l3xkulu said:Didn't it take several months before they investigated. I'd say after all that time any physical evidence would be healed. Then it becomes his word vs hers.
Big or small, kill em all
darn2ten":2tibqcc6 said:I especially like this part.
"Had FSU . . . instead complied with its own policies and federal law by promptly investigating plaintiff's rape and sanctioning Winston while protecting plaintiff's safety, Winston would have been removed as a threat to plaintiff long before ever suiting up to play football in a Seminoles jersey, and plaintiff would be on campus progressing toward an FSU degree," the complaint stated. "Instead, plaintiff was forced to leave campus while Winston remains, having suffered no consequences."
Point is all this handled wrong in the first place wether he's guilty or not. All FSU could think about was covering for their boy. Seems there was also another girl that after a encounter with Jameis didn't exactly call it "rape", but felt violated and had to seek consuling? It's obvious this whole case wasn't handled right from the start. Here's another link that explains it pretty good.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014 ... .html?_r=0
baddnole":1ugbiqcc said:Why did this girl,Erica, at the Clemson game text to Marcus Jordon,yep Michaels Boy, how good her QB was. Thats in the papers also.darn2ten":1ugbiqcc said:I especially like this part.
"Had FSU . . . instead complied with its own policies and federal law by promptly investigating plaintiff's rape and sanctioning Winston while protecting plaintiff's safety, Winston would have been removed as a threat to plaintiff long before ever suiting up to play football in a Seminoles jersey, and plaintiff would be on campus progressing toward an FSU degree," the complaint stated. "Instead, plaintiff was forced to leave campus while Winston remains, having suffered no consequences."
Point is all this handled wrong in the first place wether he's guilty or not. All FSU could think about was covering for their boy. Seems there was also another girl that after a encounter with Jameis didn't exactly call it "rape", but felt violated and had to seek consuling? It's obvious this whole case wasn't handled right from the start. Here's another link that explains it pretty good.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014 ... .html?_r=0
When does Treon's title 9 case start?Does UF have a COC hearing? Is Tebow going to be called in the Hernandez trial.Did Elijah Williams finally pay off his accuser from the rape charge? Dont throw rocks.
darn2ten":1156nyvt said:Jcalder":1156nyvt said:Didn't it take several months before they investigated. I'd say after all that time any physical evidence would be healed. Then it becomes his word vs hers.
Big or small, kill em all
Yes, read that 2nd link. Explains how sloppy it was handled.
darn2ten":3leeezu9 said:I especially like this part.
"Had FSU . . . instead complied with its own policies and federal law by promptly investigating plaintiff's rape and sanctioning Winston while protecting plaintiff's safety, Winston would have been removed as a threat to plaintiff long before ever suiting up to play football in a Seminoles jersey, and plaintiff would be on campus progressing toward an FSU degree," the complaint stated. "Instead, plaintiff was forced to leave campus while Winston remains, having suffered no consequences."
Point is all this handled wrong in the first place wether he's guilty or not. All FSU could think about was covering for their boy. Seems there was also another girl that after a encounter with Jameis didn't exactly call it "rape", but felt violated and had to seek consuling? It's obvious this whole case wasn't handled right from the start. Here's another link that explains it pretty good.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014 ... .html?_r=0
mjac":2bz7vtu2 said:darn2ten":2bz7vtu2 said:I especially like this part.
"Had FSU . . . instead complied with its own policies and federal law by promptly investigating plaintiff's rape and sanctioning Winston while protecting plaintiff's safety, Winston would have been removed as a threat to plaintiff long before ever suiting up to play football in a Seminoles jersey, and plaintiff would be on campus progressing toward an FSU degree," the complaint stated. "Instead, plaintiff was forced to leave campus while Winston remains, having suffered no consequences."
Point is all this handled wrong in the first place wether he's guilty or not. All FSU could think about was covering for their boy. Seems there was also another girl that after a encounter with Jameis didn't exactly call it "rape", but felt violated and had to seek consuling? It's obvious this whole case wasn't handled right from the start. Here's another link that explains it pretty good.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014 ... .html?_r=0
Thanks for posting the NYT link. It is a lousy link. The NYT has been notoriously misleading through this entire matter. They (NYT) are the ones who originally broke the story and quite naturally (these days) they are going to continue to slant/hype the story so the real facts won't make them look bad.
Here is another link written by someone else that apparently knows a thing or two about the timeline in this issue and has taken the time to put it in perspective. It is a long read because it contains links to the actual police reports, hospital records and independent investigator's reports. All this information is now available to the public. I wonder why the NYT will not include this information their story?
I challenge you read it and then consider the NYT version of the events. Or, will you continue to voice contempt prior to investigation?
http://chopchat.com/2014/12/24/heres-ne ... t-telling/
In the end, this girl (and her family/lawyers) will probably win the federal law suit against FSU She has tried to get into everyone else's pockets and failed. FSU's pockets are still open and deep. FSU just wants her to go away and will not fight the feds.
darn2ten":35w1al84 said:Man, really? A piece wrote on Chopchat, a FSU football site. What did you really think it was going to say? Wrote by a FSU fan boy who still has to admit the investigation was botched and FSU was tipped off by the TPD and got a jump on the whole thing. I also reckon that the writer, Patrick Nohe doesn't fall far from the FSU trouble tree either.
Patrick M Nohe's Arrest Record Details
Official government public records show that Patrick M Nohe was booked into jail on Sunday, April 11, 2010 in Leon County, Florida.
mjac":215u3yok said:darn2ten":215u3yok said:Man, really? A piece wrote on Chopchat, a FSU football site. What did you really think it was going to say? Wrote by a FSU fan boy who still has to admit the investigation was botched and FSU was tipped off by the TPD and got a jump on the whole thing. I also reckon that the writer, Patrick Nohe doesn't fall far from the FSU trouble tree either.
Patrick M Nohe's Arrest Record Details
Official government public records show that Patrick M Nohe was booked into jail on Sunday, April 11, 2010 in Leon County, Florida.
Judging from your reply, you did not chose to take my challenge to read Mr Nohe's article. Much less read any of the links he furnished. Had you read the article Mr Nohe said this: "Now I understand that's a bold claim, so I'm going to provide actual evidence rather than just ask you take me at my word. I don't have a masthead like 'New York Times' over my name to ensure people buy into my credibility– I'll do this the old-fashioned way."
Mr Nohe did do it in a old fashioned way. Unlike the NYT, he presented actual evidence. Something you are unaccustomed or unprepared to accept.
I see you instead posted a reference to Mr Nohe purported arrest, regardless of the offense, which you fail to mention, neither in which case has absolutely any bearing on this discussion.
There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation. —Herbert Spencer