• Help Support TNDeer:

New Cameras for 2011 Leupold has two

I'm glad to see this, especially from Leupold.

Competition is what makes our free enterprise system sizzle.
It has been so much of what has made America great and lead the world in innovation.

With our capitalist system, we keep inventing better things at progressively lower prices.

Noted that one of the Leupold models is advertised as a 10mp cam. To my knowledge, no one else is currently offering anything above an interpolated 8mp. I'll assume Leupold's 10mp is also "interpolated", but sounds like they've upped the ante.

Leupold was also innovative in having multiple choices on the triggering area. Homebrews have allowed us to have either a long, narrow triggering area; or, a wide, but shorter-range triggering area. Leupold's cam offers the ability to set for either wide or long or both simultaneously, as your choice in the field for any particular set-up. That's going to be a useful feature.
 
I too hope they are good reliable cameras, we need more of those these days. As with all other things, only time will tell! Wes, I figured this excerpt alone would be enough to scare you away "One of the unique features is the hand-held, plug-in RCX controller/viewer for programming the camera and viewing images ".... :grin:
 
Wes Parrish said:
Competition is what makes our free enterprise system sizzle.
It has been so much of what has made America great and lead the world in innovation.

With our capitalist system, we keep inventing better things at progressively lower prices.

The problem is, almost all Trail-cams are being made in China with Chinese engineering.
 
BSK said:
Wes Parrish said:
Competition is what makes our free enterprise system sizzle.
It has been so much of what has made America great and lead the world in innovation.

With our capitalist system, we keep inventing better things at progressively lower prices.

The problem is, almost all Trail-cams are being made in China with Chinese engineering.

X2
Sad thing is, this will most likely be another reputable company that may get smeared with less than normal quality products. Lets hope not. When I started seeing the cheap Leupold scopes at Walmart, sort of figured wouldnt be long until they started using their good name to pawn off cheap products on consumers too. But agin, hopefully they will be great products!
 
backstraps said:
BSK said:
Wes Parrish said:
Competition is what makes our free enterprise system sizzle.
It has been so much of what has made America great and lead the world in innovation.

With our capitalist system, we keep inventing better things at progressively lower prices.

The problem is, almost all Trail-cams are being made in China with Chinese engineering.

X2
Sad thing is, this will most likely be another reputable company that may get smeared with less than normal quality products. Lets hope not. When I started seeing the cheap Leupold scopes at Walmart, sort of figured wouldnt be long until they started using their good name to pawn off cheap products on consumers too. But agin, hopefully they will be great products!
Do you think the Leupold scopes sold at walmart are of less quality than the ones that bass pro or cabelas sells?
 
BSK said:
Wes Parrish said:
Competition is what makes our free enterprise system sizzle.
It has been so much of what has made America great and lead the world in innovation.

With our capitalist system, we keep inventing better things at progressively lower prices.

The problem is, almost all Trail-cams are being made in China with Chinese engineering.
That's why so many fail right out of the box!

Too bad the unions and gov regulations have caused so much of our manufacturing to leave the U.S. I bet if Leupold made its cams in Oregon the quality control would be top-notch.
 
Andy S. said:
Wes, I figured this excerpt alone would be enough to scare you away "One of the unique features is the hand-held, plug-in RCX controller/viewer for programming the camera and viewing images ".... :grin:
You can bet I'll be very S-L-O-W to get one, way after Chasingame finishes their testing. The remote "might" be OK if it's made to use regular replaceable batteries such as AAA. Where Uway really screwed up imo was using non-replaceable batteries in their remotes, then having very poor quality control on both their cams and their non-replaceable batteries in those remotes.
 
I haven't looked into it, but I'll almost guarantee Leupold is probably just puting their name on one of the current versions of Chinese camera.
 
BSK said:
I haven't looked into it, but I'll almost guarantee Leupold is probably just puting their name on one of the current versions of Chinese camera.
I will say you are probably right. Saw where it said plug in remote and there is another cam out with this feature. They can take a camera that is not in the main stream market , put their name on it and most will think it is their product. What I mean by main stream market is Bass Pro, Cabela's, Walmart, etc, etc. If a brand is not sold in these store many will never know about them. Go ask the average hunter if they ever heard of Uway or Scoutguard, most haven't unless they are on web sites like this.
 
DWM said:
They can take a camera that is not in the main stream market , put their name on it and most will think it is their product. What I mean by main stream market is Bass Pro, Cabela's, Walmart, etc, etc. If a brand is not sold in these store many will never know about them. Go ask the average hunter if they ever heard of Uway or Scoutguard, most haven't unless they are on web sites like this.

Over the last year, I've received a real education on how most of the "mainstream" cameras came about. Almost without exception, none of the sellers actually make their cameras. They all buy them from the Chinese market, and simply pay to have their name put on the camera.

Ever notice how many of the cameras on the market look/function very similarly? That's because they are all based on the same original technology. Unfortunately, copywrite laws are little enforced in China these days. It is extremely easy (and I believe actually encouraged) to steal technology there. One company starts producing a camera they engineered and then one of the engineers simply walks away with that technology and starts his own company manufacturering almost the identical product (at least the internal components are the same). Then another engineer walks away with the technology from that new company and starts his own company. That's how most of the camera manufacturing has developed there--theft of intellectual property, and the government just looks the other way (or actually encourages the practice). I'm not exagerating when I say you can contact the company that makes a "name brand" camera and tell them you want a thousand of those cameras with your name on them. They will gladly make and sell you those cameras with your name on them for sale in the U.S. As soon as a "new" name brand camera shows up on the U.S. market, you can find the very same camera for sale on Ebay with "Jo Shmoe's" name on it. This activity is illegal in U.S. manufacturing, but standard practice in China.

Every notice just how similar the ScoutGuard, Covert and Bushnell cameras are? It's called "theft of intellectual property."
 
BSK, That is why I try to avoid those China products but these American companies don't give us much of a choice. If a practice is illegal in this country they our country should make it illegal to import products that use those practices. It might bring more of our jobs back and lighten the load on our landfills. We have high enviromental impact standards in this country that drive the cost of production up then we give tax breaks to companies for importing products from countries with low standards. I'm not saying we need to lower our standards just don't allow products in from places that don't match ours but that is another topic that will get me all upset.
 
BSK said:
I haven't looked into it, but I'll almost guarantee Leupold is probably just puting their name on one of the current versions of Chinese camera.


you may be right, but I hope not. They have prided theirselves in the past of being 100 percent American made.
 
DWM said:
BSK, That is why I try to avoid those China products but these American companies don't give us much of a choice. If a practice is illegal in this country they our country should make it illegal to import products that use those practices. It might bring more of our jobs back and lighten the load on our landfills. We have high enviromental impact standards in this country that drive the cost of production up then we give tax breaks to companies for importing products from countries with low standards. I'm not saying we need to lower our standards just don't allow products in from places that don't match ours but that is another topic that will get me all upset.

I couldn't agree more.
 
No reason to get rumors started before we even know where these cams are being made. Unless your a pro staffer for other camera company(ies) :whistle: We all know this is how the rumors start.
 
Back
Top