J.M.A.N.
Well-Known Member
X2BSK said:I haven't looked into it, but I'll almost guarantee Leupold is probably just puting their name on one of the current versions of Chinese camera.
X2BSK said:I haven't looked into it, but I'll almost guarantee Leupold is probably just puting their name on one of the current versions of Chinese camera.
cecil30-30 said:Do you think the Leupold scopes sold at walmart are of less quality than the ones that bass pro or cabelas sells?backstraps said:BSK said:Wes Parrish said:Competition is what makes our free enterprise system sizzle.
It has been so much of what has made America great and lead the world in innovation.
With our capitalist system, we keep inventing better things at progressively lower prices.
The problem is, almost all Trail-cams are being made in China with Chinese engineering.
X2
Sad thing is, this will most likely be another reputable company that may get smeared with less than normal quality products. Lets hope not. When I started seeing the cheap Leupold scopes at Walmart, sort of figured wouldnt be long until they started using their good name to pawn off cheap products on consumers too. But agin, hopefully they will be great products!
smstone22 said:No reason to get rumors started before we even know where these cams are being made. Unless your a pro staffer for other camera company(ies) :whistle: We all know this is how the rumors start.
While I'd LIKE to think that, I made that similar erroneous assumption when I purchased a Bushnell Trophy cam this past October. Really expected better from Bushnell, especially considering how much time they had "to work the bugs out" and solve any prior problems with this particular cam. Wasn't like it had "just come out" and I had a beta version for field testing. Rather, mine was purchased at Bass Pro Oct. 2010, and failed right out of the box. Makes me not to want anything now with a Bushnell logo.backstraps said:Just IMO, I hope if Leupold puts their name on the new RCX-2 that is will be quality.
Wes Parrish said:While I'd LIKE to think that, I made that similar erroneous assumption when I purchased a Bushnell Trophy cam this past October. Really expected better from Bushnell, especially considering how much time they had "to work the bugs out" and solve any prior problems with this particular cam. Wasn't like it had "just come out" and I had a beta version for field testing. Rather, mine was purchased at Bass Pro Oct. 2010, and failed right out of the box. Makes me not to want anything now with a Bushnell logo.backstraps said:Just IMO, I hope if Leupold puts their name on the new RCX-2 that is will be quality.
IMO, if Leupold does like Bushnell has done with their trail cams, it could seriously hurt their scope sales. Will just wait and see, and will not be among the first suckers to go try out one of the new Leupolds.
But Bushnell is "playing" off their reputation of offering reasonably good optical products at reasonable prices relative to their quality.BSK said:Bushnell does not make their trail-cams. They simply pay to have their name put on another of the Chinese "clone" cameras, all of which are based on the same original technology (HCO/Covert/Bushnell).
backstraps said:cecil30-30 said:Do you think the Leupold scopes sold at walmart are of less quality than the ones that bass pro or cabelas sells?backstraps said:BSK said:Wes Parrish said:Competition is what makes our free enterprise system sizzle.
It has been so much of what has made America great and lead the world in innovation.
With our capitalist system, we keep inventing better things at progressively lower prices.
The problem is, almost all Trail-cams are being made in China with Chinese engineering.
X2
Sad thing is, this will most likely be another reputable company that may get smeared with less than normal quality products. Lets hope not. When I started seeing the cheap Leupold scopes at Walmart, sort of figured wouldnt be long until they started using their good name to pawn off cheap products on consumers too. But agin, hopefully they will be great products!
Hello Cecil. I never made mention of Wally scopes being of less quality than the same scope sold at larger Outdoor retailers.
Just IMO, I hope if Leupold puts their name on the new RCX-2 that is will be quality. BUT at 289-339.00 price range I doubt it will be much more than a Chinese or Japanese camera. If the camera says it is made in the USA, I would research the internals and make sure it simply isnt assembled in USA and made overseas... just my thoughts
Sounds almost exactly what I first heard about the Uway NT50 series. In their initial marketing, Uway was promoting a "twin pack" of their cams, with a single remote controller that could operate both cams, and allow one to purchase additional cams (without need for more than one controller to operate all).DWM said:From what I am finding out it looks like the camera and controller will be sold separately. If it is like what I am seeing then you must buy one controller that will operate several cameras. You can not program your settings without it.
DWM said:That makes the first one expensive at either $350 or $400 but still not bad if it is American made black flash.
If you are right then they can forget about getting my money. I will just save up and get another Reconyx for a few dollars more. Sent them an email trying to find out more and no reply so not impressed with their service. If they can't answer a few questions about a product they are in the process of bringing to market. Then how are they going to answer questions when they get flooded with problems from a new introduction?BSK said:DWM said:That makes the first one expensive at either $350 or $400 but still not bad if it is American made black flash.
Looking at the design, I can almost guarantee they are Chinese. In addition, they aren't black-flash.