• Help Support TNDeer:

Ole Miss Violations

TeamMainStreet":p8c0oypn said:
Saban turned them in for beating him two years in a row.

Saban should send Freeze a Thank You note. This year's loss gave Bama the wake-up call they needed to run the rest of the table.

On a related note, I'll be very surprised if the NCAA finds any substantial violations on Hugh's watch; he really impresses me as a straight-laced type. Now what may have happened under Houston Nutt...well that's another story.
 
giphy.gif
 
Charges against the football program seem relatively minor as reported. The problem is that a school doesn't know what else the investigators might dig up before an investigation is closed. Also, simply putting a school on probation significantly raises the potential penalties for violations that might occur in the future.
 
mtn cur":18mcxw7v said:
The problem Ole Missy has is the the number of coaches from acrosss
different conferences that called and complained about freeze over several years.
Saban, Richt, Fisher, Mullen, Sumlin and Kelly....
The SEC can't cover for too long when this happens. And then freeze throws the "prove it" out on social media. What a rube.

http://espn.go.com/college-football...all-program-cited-13-28-rules-violations-ncaa

I'm not sure what you're referring to. Only 4 of the violations were under Freeze. One rule has since been changed and all of these violations had already been self-reported. These are all pretty darn minor things - just like I said they would be 2 weeks ago when all of this came out and people started wetting their pants because they didn't think a team like Ole Miss could ever possibly start improving legitimately. :roll:

Of the 13 violations involving football, four involve the current staff and were self-reported by Ole Miss, which also took steps to self-impose penalties in some cases, sources told ESPN.com. Those four violations are a violation of the "bump rule," which says coaches can't have contact with a recruit during a designated non-contact evaluation period; an improper recruiting video made outside the locker room; a person the NCAA considers a booster illegally transporting a recruit to campus; and a stepfather of a recruit having his lodging paid for during an official visit. That last rule has since been changed by the NCAA.
 
This is a large web! Two assistant coach were given the choice to talk and keep
coaching or remain silent and not coach. The information told has led to kids who have received money. The kids then were given the choice talk or forgo eligibility. The kids spoke and this thing has covered MANY states and lots and lots of money!!!!
 
TNReb":1zayy4qe said:
From everything I've heard, the majority of the football violations were from back in the Houston Nutt error - not the recruiting classes of the last couple years. The school has known about these for a while - it's just taken the NCAA a while to charge them.

If anyone thinks this stuff doesn't happen at every single school, you're nuts.

It's awfully convenient that this crap happened years ago, under a different head coach (and athletic director), and they decide to charge the school right before national signing day. :roll: They even said there have been no new allegations since Freeze has been there. This will turn out to amount to nothing - just an attempt to give the school a black eye right before signing day. If this had come out in July, it wouldn't even be a headline. Just wait and see what the charges are and how many people actually care about women's basketball.
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top