Thank you! I have tried my best to point some of things out over the years and even used LBL ( later start date for years)as an example several times to show that the Chamberlain theory is simply that. It seems like if you don't buy in you are considered anti turkey. The counties you guys were in are some of the top in the state in kills( last season) even though they are being studied for turkey decline, (some are not in the top) Missouri actually killed its highest number of birds in 2004 60,744 but harvest dropped around 25,000 birds by I believe 2018 35,784. They follow every Chamberlain playbook move there is , even one turkey the first week, hunting stops mid day. In the article I read the biologist got into hatch#, predators , poult survival. I believe he even mentioned leveling off effect but he never said I think we need to move our dates back even more. If your goal is to save male dominant turkey it's my opinion banning decoys and fans for a while will make that happen if it's necessary for breeding plus it keeps people safe on public. Saturday evening I seen a guy slipping through the woods with a fan in one hand across his chest spread out and two gobbler decoy heads sticking out of each side of his vest. I very quickly let him I know I was there and leaving, he had approached from another road. My point is that Tn is studying the situation before they just start moving dates and doing things that are simply a theory, that's the right thing to do. As you mentioned other states are drinking the kool aid without any proof but continue to have issues. Harvest numbers have remained steady in Tn since 2000 at around 30,000 . I have been told that harvest numbers are irrelevant but you just pointed out a good fact about tracking jake harvest . I think we all need to realize that we can have varying opinions but it doesn't mean we aren't for turkey if we don't jump in the boat with Chamberlain just yet,! Go check out the guys in Alabama thoughts on the guy! He doesn't seem to be a fan favorite at all. I am positive he knows more than me but I just don't buy that Tn needs to open with Indiana and Minnesota. If the study proves me wrong so be it and move the state back a week ( meet in the middle). I have seen hens alone , and nesting since the first week in April. Turkey are in places I never dreamed I would hear or see them. I know other areas are not so fortunate but at least our state is trying to figure it out and studying the situation to see what should be done and if theory is correct before moving everyone in that direction and as you pointed out taking opportunity from all that would never be gotten back. Prime example bonus birds? These were birds that were on specific tracts of land with a quota system. Can anyone explain to me how taking that bird away from a guy drawn on a hunt that usually stops at noon for two , three days has an impact on our statewide turkey population? I questioned it but no one can seem to explain the significance except to say that is how other states do it and we just wanted to make it 1 limit for all. So it was hard to understand that if you get this hunt it doesn't count against your statewide limit? Why not allow the area manager to make that decision? Again it's drawn hunts on specific land , with a quota? That was part of the appeal of these hunts. We will probably never get those back in my opinion after my discussion. For what biological reason? Why not let our state finish the study before making any hasty changes and then we will all know what is best with proof one way or the other! Thanks for sharing Th88!Unlike a bunch of folks, me and many other biologists don't fully bite into Chamberlain's theory. Key word being THEORY. This is not science based evidence he is spouting and many states are hopping on this popular bandwagon of changing seasons and taking away opportunity. Opportunity that will very likely not be given back. If pushing back season helped so much, Arkansas should be in much better shape than it is now! I've hunted MO for 15 years and the region I spend the most time in has half or maybe even less than half of the birds it did just 5 years ago. It's a function of mother nature, habitat, and the natural ups and downs of turkey populations. And on this topic, reducing the limit by a bird will have little to no noticeable effect on overall turkey numbers. More of a liberal approach to hunting: "You can't kill another bird to save one for this less experienced hunter, everyone deserves a turkey!"
One more thing. The delayed opener in the Middle TN counties happened to fall on a season where there are a good many 2 year olds. I track harvest data and the Jake harvests for 2020 in some of these counties was well above the 5 year running average. From this alone I knew 2021 would be better in a certain area. But people will jump the gun and try to contribute the good aeason/harvest to the later opener when it fact the 2019 hatch is the cause, not season changes. We saw the same thing last year in some southeastern states when folks tried blaming COVID for high harvests and ignored the fact there were more 2 year olds on the landscape in many areas than there had been in quiet a while. Even Chamberlain ignored this fact when he published that white paper of COVID's impacts on turkey.
I could go on, but I think you can see where I stand from the above.
Last edited: