I'll preface this by saying I have in no way researched this lady's body of work. For those of you who are not familiar with her she is an autistic lady who made tremendous advancements in certain fields in spite of all of the obstacles and the failures of the educational system to provide people on the spectrum with alternative learning methods. A large portion of her research was regarding animal behavior, so as I listened to one of her speeches tonight I was reminded of certain posts on this board regarding mature deer that are killed and those that remain elusive. I think we assume, because of our pecking order in the food chain,that ultimately hunters will prevail, and maybe that leads us to fail to understand that in the deer's natural habitat they are brilliant. She mentioned that at a fire hydrant a dog knows who has been there, are they friend or are they foe, is mating a possibility, or am I about to kick my butt kicked? Of course, that makes sense right? I have always assumed that there is a "hunter" smell, a combination of coffee, biscuit, dead down wind, and tobacco that lets a deer know to stay away. But is it unrealistic to think that a deer knows YOUR scent? That he knows the sound of your ATV ramps in the back of a dual exhaust V8 Chevy, Colgate on your shoe laces from where you brushed your teeth 90 minutes earlier and then put your boots on? Copenhagen under your fingernails? And then is he able to compute that and know that typically equates to you walking down the SW ridge and sitting with your back to the property line on days with a N wind? Perhaps this is all overkill but I do suspect we don't give wildlife the credit that they are due at times and we allow these animals to pattern us more easily than we suspect.