Andy S. said:
The quote below is from another message board I frequent. I thought it might help some of the guys here who shoot "wad catcher" chokes like the IC.
"A short piece of cleaning rod, a 12GA brass brush (dry), and a cordless drill are standard cleaning tools for an Indian Creek choke tube possessing wad catchers. Wad catchers are designed to catch the wad and shave plastic off of it. The wad catchers can become full of plastic in as little as 3 shots. Clean it after each shot and your performance level during testing will become even more predictable."
Talking about the "wad catcher" chokes:
The Federal "Heavyweights" are not recommended (by Federal) for use with "wad catcher" or ported choke tubes. This is because the Federal "Heavyweights" have a "Flight Control" wad that is designed to stay with the shot string. I've had those wads hit the center of a pattern board at 40 yards, so they really seem to be staying with the shot column (at least from a non-ported choke).
One reason I'm bringing this up is because the Federal "Heavyweights" in #7 shot size are a
FAR SUPERIOR load to the H-17 straight #7's. The Federals are not only about 30% heavier than lead (
and about 10% heavier than H-13), but they're
coming out at a blazing 1,300 fps. The H-13 straight 7's are listed at about 1,100 fps.
Combining the greater density and 18% faster velocity, the Federals
SHOULD be superior long-range loads.
The bigger issue to me is which load patterns most uniformly. Either should do the job on a turkey's head at 45 yards.
I'm "thinking" about trying the Federal Heavyweight #7's in my Indian Creek choke. This may leave a lot more plastic behind in the ports, and may produce unacceptable patterns. Won't know until tried.
[size]
But am I "behaving stupidly" for even thinking about trying this?[/size]
My only concern is an overlooked safety issue, since Federal says their shells are not designed for ported choke tubes.