Not getting skunked is my goal. As long as I'm seeing something I can stay there but not seeing anything will have me thinking about the other things I could be doing. I'd say 8+ would be a lot.
I haven't played down there in years but back in the late 90s it was to the point where you about couldn't get a round in. They hd taken over the course.The most I ever saw in one group was at Fall Creek Falls on the golf course the day before the draw hunt. Must have been 75 or more. (So I get as close to Golf Course as legally possible the next day and only saw 2. )
Locally, a lot of deer to me is 10-12 in a setting. Those days are getting fewer and fewer.
Not me, I'm spoiledWe track how often hunters hunt as well as how much time hunters spend on stand and deer seen to calculate both the percent of hunts (a "hunt" being any time a hunter climbs into a stand) with deer/buck sightings, but also the average amount of time a hunter has to hunt to see a deer/buck (deer/buck sighting rate). I suspect what we see on our hunting property is pretty far below what most hunters would find acceptable, even though our deer density is not that low. We simply have very low-visibility habitat, which means most deer sightings are very close-range. Even in a moderate density herd, if deer have to be "bow-range" close to see them, you don't see them very often!
Over the last 20 years, hunter sighting stats:
Hunts with a deer sighting: 44%
Hunts with an antlered buck sighting (any age): 23%
Average treestand time between deer sightings: 2.6 hours
Average time between antlered buck sighting (any age): 9.2 hours
Average time between 2 1/2 year-old or older buck sighting: 23.8 hours
Average time between 3 1/2 year-old or older buck sighting: 83.3 hours
How many hunters would be happy with these sighting rates?
One of the things I like best hunting my place in Tennessee is not the number of deer I see, but has more to do with the buck to doe ratio. On our place in Houston Co. when we go out if I see 7 deer, 3 of them will most likely be bucks. Not always shootable bucks, but bucks nevertheless. It always keeps you on your toes knowing every other deer might be a buck.Rageman's thread about having quality or quantity of deer got me to wondering, what is "a lot of deer" and what is "seeing a lot of deer?" Having a higher deer density doesn't always lead to seeing a lot of deer. Much can be dependent on visibility on a given property. But how often do you need to see deer while hunting to be happy with your hunting experience?
Im happy with seeing you said hunts with deer sightings instead of sits. Im satisfied.We track how often hunters hunt as well as how much time hunters spend on stand and deer seen to calculate both the percent of hunts (a "hunt" being any time a hunter climbs into a stand) with deer/buck sightings, but also the average amount of time a hunter has to hunt to see a deer/buck (deer/buck sighting rate). I suspect what we see on our hunting property is pretty far below what most hunters would find acceptable, even though our deer density is not that low. We simply have very low-visibility habitat, which means most deer sightings are very close-range. Even in a moderate density herd, if deer have to be "bow-range" close to see them, you don't see them very often!
Over the last 20 years, hunter sighting stats:
Hunts with a deer sighting: 44%
Hunts with an antlered buck sighting (any age): 23%
Average treestand time between deer sightings: 2.6 hours
Average time between antlered buck sighting (any age): 9.2 hours
Average time between 2 1/2 year-old or older buck sighting: 23.8 hours
Average time between 3 1/2 year-old or older buck sighting: 83.3 hours
How many hunters would be happy with these sighting rates?
I would absolutely hate those rates. It is crazy how different our sight ratings are.We track how often hunters hunt as well as how much time hunters spend on stand and deer seen to calculate both the percent of hunts (a "hunt" being any time a hunter climbs into a stand) with deer/buck sightings, but also the average amount of time a hunter has to hunt to see a deer/buck (deer/buck sighting rate). I suspect what we see on our hunting property is pretty far below what most hunters would find acceptable, even though our deer density is not that low. We simply have very low-visibility habitat, which means most deer sightings are very close-range. Even in a moderate density herd, if deer have to be "bow-range" close to see them, you don't see them very often!
Over the last 20 years, hunter sighting stats:
Hunts with a deer sighting: 44%
Hunts with an antlered buck sighting (any age): 23%
Average treestand time between deer sightings: 2.6 hours
Average time between antlered buck sighting (any age): 9.2 hours
Average time between 2 1/2 year-old or older buck sighting: 23.8 hours
Average time between 3 1/2 year-old or older buck sighting: 83.3 hours
How many hunters would be happy with these sighting rates?
It is not uncommon to see that many BUCKS on a single hunt. 3-5 is very common and what I would consider normal.In the 35 years we've owned and hunted our property, I think a hunter has seen 8-10 deer in a single hunt maybe twice. We NEVER see that kind of deer activity.
Which is why I have to laugh when other hunters talk about how "good" hunters with their own land have it. I bet 90% of hunters would not find hunting my place enjoyable.
I could see that your data could be skewed due to the fact that with several people hunting, not everyone can be hunting the best spots, so you have some less productive stands getting hunted that likely would not get hunted if less people were hunting. My parcel is much smaller, but it is just me and my son hunting, so we dont have to waste time in spots we know are less likely to produce than others. We let the wind dictate which options we have and chose the best spots from those stands. Our average time between 3.5 year old bucks is slightly less than 6 hours, but there is only two of us and we are hunting the best spots we have. Last year our 3 1/2 yr old sightings per hour was much better than this year. It was too hood actually because i tagged out too quickly! A 4.5 yr old and a 6.5+ in two consecutive trips.This was our best year ever for 3 1/2+ year-old buck sightings. Average time between 3 1/2+ year-old buck sightings was 23.8 hours.
Absolutely, the later in the year it gets the less bucks use my property. Actually, i don't have many bucks until the fall shift either.Been thinking about this a lot. I don't usually hunt a stand unless things are as near right as I can get it, so, during the prime rut time that usually means seeing around 5-6 from daylight till about 1:00. Early season is on a dominate dropping oak tree it can be none or as many as 8 At my farm around the first week in December you will either see none or 10+ does if you see a single deer it's a buck, the does and fawns bunch up bad. My son and I saw 2, 3 year old bucks and 5, 2 year old bucks and 10, 1 year olds this year in about 10 sits. If we kept hunting our sightings would be MUCH lower.
I could see that your data could be skewed due to the fact that with several people hunting, not everyone can be hunting the best spots, so you have some less productive stands getting hunted that likely would not get hunted if less people were hunting. My parcel is much smaller, but it is just me and my son hunting, so we dont have to waste time in spots we know are less likely to produce than others. We let the wind dictate which options we have and chose the best spots from those stands. Our average time between 3.5 year old bucks is slightly less than 6 hours, but there is only two of us and we are hunting the best spots we have. Last year our 3 1/2 yr old sightings per hour was much better than this year. It was too hood actually because i tagged out too quickly! A 4.5 yr old and a 6.5+ in two consecutive trips.
From 2010-2015 I had 3 properties to hunt - 2 in Madison County and 1 in Benton County.1-2 deer every other day of hunting is a lot to me. I usually see 40-50 a season, with about 20 percent of those bucks. Only saw 12 this year, with 2 of those bucks.