grundsow
Well-Known Member
BSK said:grundsow said:I mean, first of all baiting and supplemental feeding are lumped together, which seems to me to give baiting a bad rap by association.
Which it should. They are equally as dangerous.
Baiting vs. Feeding - I�d like to revisit this.
After the PGC recently made baiting legal in certain places, I began placing ear corn in front of some of my trailcams in winter after hunting season to see how deer would react. I figure it�s no different than the picked corn fields around here.
You�re telling me though, that you feel this is dangerous biologically?
I mean, I really don�t see larger groups of deer, and I�m not even sure if there are more frequent visits in front of my trailcams when I bait. They simply stay in front of the camera for a longer period of time affording me more pics.
Now I have an opportunity to hunt a new property within the area where hunting over bait is legal. PGC allows no more than 5-gallons of �bait� to be used at a time. I�ve been invited to hunt a small lot to try to reduce deer density. Flowers and shrubs are being eaten at someone�s house as well as the newly planted hardwoods in Tubex and even the evergreens on an adjacent farm now enrolled in some sort of conservation program.
Right now there is a group of about 10 deer that spend the day between a woodlot of about 2-acres or less (3,200 deer per forested sq. mile!!) and their �sanctuary� - an overgrown meadow about another acre or two in size. I don�t have access to the meadow or picked soybean and corn fields (and wouldn't know how to hunt them if I did), so my options are get the deer into the woods somehow where I can hang a treestand. I was thinking baiting.
BTW, haven�t you run baited trailcam surveys?