See link for the proposals
I am also for dropping the limit to 2 turkeys.
Deer season I could actually get behind the 1 buck a year thing also.
I don't necessarily have a problem with 2 bucks. But if you look at the states that have a one buck limit around us Kentucky, Illinois, Ohio, Indiana and Missouri they have really good numbers and lots of big deer. Missouri only allows one during firearms season and one in bow season so technically you can kill 2 bucks in Missouri if you rifle and bow hunt. I am not a trophy hunter per se but I would rather shoot a fat doe than a 1.5 year old small six pointer. Not going to be that much difference in the amount of meat I get. I am not knocking anyone's choice on which deer they decide to shoot that is all personal preference. Just my opinion on how I hunt.IMO, most important thing is to have regulations which are very simple, and most easily enforced, as any law is typically only as good as its enforcement, and unnecessary regulations just create unnecessary resentment and unnecessary hardship on the most honest sportsmen.
While this may be a good idea, it may only be "necessary" if TWRA fails to delay the season opening by a week or two.
IMO, at this time, the very best, most easily enforced regulatory change for turkey hunting should be a delayed opening date by at least 1 week. My personal idea is the resource (and the hunters) would be best served ongoing by delaying the opening by 2 weeks, while extending the close by 1 week later, meaning the season is only reduced by 1 week, and would still be one of the longest spring turkey seasons in the U.S.
IMO, going to a 1-buck limit (at this time) is simply unnecessary, and possibly even counter-productive towards maintaining/achieving that good buck:doe ratio. The 2-buck limit seems the most ideal compromise, and the least "compromise" to anyone.
What we most need to be concerned about is how TWRA reacts to Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD). Outside the CWD zones, I have no significant complaints regarding the statewide deer regs, which may be best just left unchanged.
I was reading the regs for Missouri and it seemed like you could take two bucks. One during rifle and one during now. Thanks for the clarification.Actually, in Missouri, a bow hunter can kill 2 bucks. One before the rifle season and one after the rifle season. They can kill one with a gun in gun season with a firearms license.
There's no evidence of what you claim in all the other states or with the current night hunting that is taking place by me and others in Tennessee. If your gonna claim it has "too many issues" you need to back it up with FACTS and not your imagination.I would be against night hunting for yotes, pretty sure I have read trapping is the best method of control, to many issues with it imo, at least with coon hunters they are a dying breed unfortunately and have to own a dog to partake, every yahoo with a rifle will have the opportunity to trespass also, most would be safe but a lot of area's it just isn't .I been involved with coon hunting since I was 3 years old and have been hauled across more property's we didn't have permission to be on than property we did, only thing needed is a safe place to park the truck, you all ready to double the license fee to double the game wardens so we can have a 2nd and 3rd shift? it's not as simple as some folks think it is when you start listing the good and bad with everything that's impacted with life's choices.
So very true!And as I've stated many times, I strongly disagree with the practice of knocking down deer densities to "slow" the spread of CWD. This may be "throwing the baby out with the bathwater." . . . . . Knocking back deer densities will just drive hunters out of the sport, and hunters are THE key piece of deer management everywhere.
They are spending an incredible amount of resources trying to figure out what the real problem is, and to come up with regulations that will help. They are researching a number of possible causes for the decline. The answer is by no means a simple one.I sure wish the TWRA would help the poor turkeys out,they are quickly going away.Guess we can fish and squirrel hunt in the spring!
While I agree with you, the problem I have with TWRA regarding the turkeys is they have done very little in the meantime in terms of proactively managing the statewide turkey population. Any changes have been way too slow (by years) and way to small to make much difference.They are spending an incredible amount of resources trying to figure out what the real problem is, and to come up with regulations that will help. They are researching a number of possible causes for the decline. The answer is by no means a simple one.
They are spending an incredible amount of resources trying to figure out what the real problem is, and to come up with regulations that will help. They are researching a number of possible causes for the decline. The answer is by no means a simple one.