Let me say one more time: I do not want a 1-buck limit in TN.
But, it is interesting that many hunters, like myself, may have somewhat a 1-buck limit on their own private hunting lands.
Why?
Part of why may be because not allowing any one hunter to take multiple bucks annually, in turn, provides all hunters more opportunity to take "a" buck annually?
The 1-buck limit is not always mainly about growing more older bucks.
It can be as much about promoting the prospects of 11 hunters taking "a" buck,
instead of 1 hunter taking 11 bucks.
To add to what TboneD has stated, anyone want to explain the irony of a 1-buck limit state, such as Kentucky, having less than half as many gun-hunting days (as TN), yet the percentage of KY hunters killing "a" buck is higher in KY than in TN?