Setterman":2ty2b7ze said:
I also don't bash individual hunters on this site no matter how they kill.
I don't think that's right and therefore don't really play that game
I totally agree.
Personally,
I most enjoy turkey hunting the same way Setterman does it.
But I often find myself simply taking a single calling position, for the duration of that hunt,
because it can be the more practical way to hunt a smaller parcel,
it prevents me from spooking off birds on to the adjoining property (where I cannot hunt)
and it also is more courteous to other hunters.
No one has mentioned the "courtesy" factor
whereby a stationary hunter will not conflict so much with multiple hunters, coming from multiple directions,
all trying to assault the same gobbling bird.
As for decoys, my personal opinion is they are every bit as much a liability as an asset,
and I personally don't use them much. My exception is typically when I'm taking another hunter with me,
(and we're doing the stationary set-up). I will often use a hen decoy, but I even do that differently,
as I don't want that hen decoy to be a liability to my calling.
When I use a hen decoy, I typically somewhat "hide" her,
so that a gobbler will likely be in range before he even sees her.
Having experimented with decoys over the years,
it's just too often that a hen decoy actually causes a gobbler to hang up, rather than come closer.
(Same is true of the full-strut gobbler decoys.)
My primary goal of the decoy is to get that gobblers attention
once he's already in range!
I'm still calling him in!
Still watching him strut his way in, still everything like it would be
without that decoy.
Still much like when I "run & gun" on a larger parcel, except that I didn't change my calling position multiple times.
The advantage of the decoy is mainly for my less experienced hunter sitting beside me.
This person is typically less experienced at effectively shooting, not just at hunting.
By often holding the bird a bit longer within range,
there is typically more opportunity for a good head shot, a clean kill, no pellets in the breast,
no wounded bird that goes off to die un-recovered.
This year, I've called in two older Toms for another hunter.
Both came to my calling, not the decoy.
Both saw the decoy when they were at about 35 yards.
Both would have been killed without the decoy.
But I believe the decoy enhanced a better show,
and provided more opportunities for a clean kill.
The young lady I "guided" (different days)
killed them both with a single head shot each
(both around 20 yards distance) using my 20 ga shotgun.
Our set-up the first day was one in which a shot over about 35 yards wasn't even possible.
So I loaded up the little 20 ga with a 1 1/8 oz "reduced recoil" 2 3/4" Federal HW #7.
Not much more recoil than a .22 rimfire, but works great inside "traditional" turkey killing range.
(Her 2nd bird was killed with a little heavier load of TSS #9's.)
Neither of her turkeys could have died any quicker if shot with a 3 1/2" 12 ga magnum anything.
Contrast that to all the stories you're hearing by many novices "running & gunning"
taking low-probability shots at multiple birds, many of which ultimately die of their wounds, un-recovered,
a few days after they're shot at.
Like Setterman, I often have someone else hunting with me, too.
But I'm often hunting a smaller parcel where it's not so feasible to hunt like I'd prefer.
Unlike Setterman, I don't believe decoys are much more an asset than a liability,
although for novices hunting large fields, perhaps they are more an asset.
I despise carrying the things myself, don't want to expose myself by putting one out (or retrieving it),
which is one of the over-looked ways by many they are a liability.
Those who spend more time turkey hunting with decoys, I believe,
will eventually come to personally disdain decoys.
Main reason we're seeing all these TV celebrities "endorsing" decoys
is because they're being paid for their endorsements.