I just can't see passing judgment about something I read on the internet, that may be leaving out some key details, may have been a "set-up", may just be a mistake, who knows.
That said, I do think those in law enforcement should generally be subjected to the same repercussions that we subject others.
Also believe there was much wisdom in the statement:
Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone,
as well as the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
So, no, I'm not jumping on some internet bandwagon to burn someone at the stake due to some hearsay, and that's all it is (
at least here on this forum) until and unless some solid evidence of a crime is presented.
Ultimately, I may end up agreeing with the original poster, but it's not going to happen because of internet hearsay.
Lastly, we can choose to measure one's life with more bias on his good or his bad decisions, realizing every one of us has made tons of bad decisions, often without legal ramifications only because we didn't get caught.
In the case of TWRA officer Chris Combs, I know nothing, absolutely nothing.
In the case of Dale Grandstand, I've heard mostly good, like from the link below:
May 25, 2006, wasn't a typical day on the job for Jereme Odom. He helped save a life and then found his own life threatened, as well.
our.tennessee.edu