Likely gettting paid off by the usual suspects…….. Duke & Kentucky!!!
SEC tournament
- Thread starter THEdonkey0515
- Start date
Calamari has never seen a rule he wouldn't break.
Displaced_Vol
Well-Known Member
Barnes had some good comments on it. What they(the committee) historically has said matters apparently matters none: scheduling quality non conference opponents, no "bad losses" (wtf have quad 1 this and quad 2 that?) and playing your best basketball at the end of the year…the committee obviously has predetermined all the 1s & 2s. What's it matter, who knows. From a statistical stand point it matters a great deal as each seeding improvement pretty drastically increases the odds of advancing each round. Just the raw data of it. But in a more practical sense a 2 vs 3 shouldn't matter if the team is ready to play, has good matchups and no let downs. If we continue playing like we are now I feel really good about it.
encore06
Well-Known Member
The
The seeding were made prior to the SEC finals. That's why the SEC coaches have been stressing for years to move the games up a day, but money talk. Take solace that UT had a much easier path than #2 seeded Duke
encore06
Well-Known Member
Show me rule Cal or his assistants have broken while he's been at UK. One, go ahead and show me.
Mescalero
Well-Known Member
It's as if the selection committee made up its mind last weekend before the conference tournaments started. Several bizarre seedlings.
I'm glad you specified "AT KENTUCKY"!
This means even more tonight.
Is this the greatest upset ever in the tourney?
I'm going to see if I can find Cals post-game.
THEdonkey0515
Well-Known Member
Should have NEVER been a 2 seed .
# overrated
# Saint Peters
# overrated
# Saint Peters
Roll tide
That's low class… I giggled
encore06
Well-Known Member
They stUnK it up in OT. Missed free throws is a killer in a tight game . Give St Peters credit. They deserved the win
