I never discount the role of localized genetics in antler development. However, in most instances where I see a high percentage of mature bucks with 6 or fewer points, the problem is high-grading of the middle-aged buck population. I have a club client that for many years had a 2 1/2 year-old buck harvest rule. This meant the very best 2 1/2 and 3 1/2 year-old were shot ever year. The bottom end middle-aged bucks were not killed. What this produced was a lot of mature bucks with 6 or fewer points. In fact, the first photo census I ran for them found 25% of all their mature bucks had 6 or fewer points, and only 19% had 9 or more points. Looking at data from nearby clients, I found most well-managed properties in the region with similar habitat had 35-50% mature bucks with 9 or more points. So it wasn't the habitat. We began a program where I produced a photo list of middle-aged bucks to protect. They were the top-end middle-aged bucks, basically 2 1/2 and 3 1/2 year-old bucks with 9 or more points. The club made copies of these trail-cam photos and hung them in every shooting house - basically an ABSOLUTELY DO NOT SHOOT list. In just two years were decreased the percentage of mature bucks with 6 or fewer points from 25% to 0%. And now, 5 years into the program, 44% of mature bucks have 9 or more points, and even 27% of 3 1/2 year-old bucks have 9 or more points (it had been 5% at the beginning of the program).