• Help Support TNDeer:

Woo Hoo All SEC Championship

Fromm is cool and calm for a freshman but after Alabamas defense pile drives, spears, stone cold stuns, and skull drags him he will be shell shocked and UGA will have to put it all on Chubb and Michel. Against any other defense, that would probably be Ok but Bama can stop the run also.

Here is Fromm about mid 2nd qtr.

giphy.gif
 
whats funny is the CFP was made because of the 2011 lsu/bama (all sec) national championship game, and here we are :rotf: :rotf:
 
Another tidbit worth pointing out is that Auburn is going to have to watch its 2 biggest rivals, who they beat, play for the National Championship. ...that's gotta suck.
 
BamaProud":3cj4361o said:
Another tidbit worth pointing out is that Auburn is going to have to watch its 2 biggest rivals, who they beat, play for the National Championship. ...that's gotta suck.
Click to expand...

Hahahaha
 
BamaProud":hr54tzb0 said:
Another tidbit worth pointing out is that Auburn is going to have to watch its 2 biggest rivals, who they beat, play for the National Championship. ...that's gotta suck.
Click to expand...

Too bad, so sad: RTR.
 
nitro_z17":7vgu733a said:
whats funny is the CFP was made because of the 2011 lsu/bama (all sec) national championship game, and here we are :rotf: :rotf:
Click to expand...

Well, Paul Finebaum might be walking on cloud nine today, but his employer's parent company isn't.

As I've said before, next season is the fifth of the five year CFP agreement. Let me get this out of the way first, Bama and UGA are both most deserving and also the top two teams in college football this year. I like taking an extreme stance from time to time, mostly because it's fun and I'm probably the only non-SEC fan left around here. Heck, maybe it wasn't Bama who shouldn't have gotten in, but Clemson. :rotf: Last night showed the Committee got it wrong ranking William's team #1. :smash: Still, Ohio State can't let an Iowa lay 55 on them, but had Iowa won 20-17 would it have been different? Probably not.

In any event, with two SEC teams playing for the championship and the Big Ten's bowl performance, and to a lesser extent an undefeated UCF beating Auburn who beat both Bama and UGA, next year is probably the last for the four team format. Add onto that the inconsistency of the Committee's decisions (2014 it was a "13th data point"; 2015 it was strength of schedule; 2016 the 13th data point doesn't matter if you've got quality wins on your side; 2017 the "eye test" matters not data). A four team playoff is probably better than an eight team playoff, but the current "playoff" really isn't a playoff. It's an invitational. An eight team playoff could end up being better in reality. Because the four team format requires a committee of humans to select participants (as opposed to using a rules-based system that generates auto-qualifiers and limits the human element to at-large participants and seeding), the corrosive tendencies of the human factor are always at risk at smothering out the good structural aspects of a four team format. At a certain point, the eight team format becomes less imperfect than the four team format. An eight team format also better accommodates two teams from the same conference.
 
RUGER":i35vosm8 said:
Kinda sucks, I don't know for sure what day it is on but I figure it will be a Monday or Tuesday and won't be over till way past my bedtime.

Didn't get to see them play chumpson and I hate to miss an all SEC championship game but I know I will.

Guess I can record it and TRY to not hear who won till I get home the next day.
Click to expand...

it is more likely you will see bigfoot Tuesday morning than making it till first break at work without somebody telling you who won,,
 
mr.big":3p0xstnn said:
it is more likely you will see bigfoot Tuesday morning than making it till first break at work without somebody telling you who won,,
Click to expand...

LOL you're probably right. :D
 
Scioto":qa3a9gh4 said:
nitro_z17":qa3a9gh4 said:
whats funny is the CFP was made because of the 2011 lsu/bama (all sec) national championship game, and here we are :rotf: :rotf:
Click to expand...

Well, Paul Finebaum might be walking on cloud nine today, but his employer's parent company isn't.

As I've said before, next season is the fifth of the five year CFP agreement. Let me get this out of the way first, Bama and UGA are both most deserving and also the top two teams in college football this year. I like taking an extreme stance from time to time, mostly because it's fun and I'm probably the only non-SEC fan left around here. Heck, maybe it wasn't Bama who shouldn't have gotten in, but Clemson. :rotf: Last night showed the Committee got it wrong ranking William's team #1. :smash: Still, Ohio State can't let an Iowa lay 55 on them, but had Iowa won 20-17 would it have been different? Probably not.

In any event, with two SEC teams playing for the championship and the Big Ten's bowl performance, and to a lesser extent an undefeated UCF beating Auburn who beat both Bama and UGA, next year is probably the last for the four team format. Add onto that the inconsistency of the Committee's decisions (2014 it was a "13th data point"; 2015 it was strength of schedule; 2016 the 13th data point doesn't matter if you've got quality wins on your side; 2017 the "eye test" matters not data). A four team playoff is probably better than an eight team playoff, but the current "playoff" really isn't a playoff. It's an invitational. An eight team playoff could end up being better in reality. Because the four team format requires a committee of humans to select participants (as opposed to using a rules-based system that generates auto-qualifiers and limits the human element to at-large participants and seeding), the corrosive tendencies of the human factor are always at risk at smothering out the good structural aspects of a four team format. At a certain point, the eight team format becomes less imperfect than the four team format. An eight team format also better accommodates two teams from the same conference.
Click to expand...
:rotf: :tu:
 
mr.big":l57oro0z said:
it is more likely you will see bigfoot Tuesday morning than making it till first break at work without somebody telling you who won,,
Click to expand...

Sounds like a good plot for SEC Short video!
 
Scioto":2akf2g22 said:
nitro_z17":2akf2g22 said:
whats funny is the CFP was made because of the 2011 lsu/bama (all sec) national championship game, and here we are :rotf: :rotf:
Click to expand...

Well, Paul Finebaum might be walking on cloud nine today, but his employer's parent company isn't.

As I've said before, next season is the fifth of the five year CFP agreement. Let me get this out of the way first, Bama and UGA are both most deserving and also the top two teams in college football this year. I like taking an extreme stance from time to time, mostly because it's fun and I'm probably the only non-SEC fan left around here. Heck, maybe it wasn't Bama who shouldn't have gotten in, but Clemson. :rotf: Last night showed the Committee got it wrong ranking William's team #1. :smash: Still, Ohio State can't let an Iowa lay 55 on them, but had Iowa won 20-17 would it have been different? Probably not.

In any event, with two SEC teams playing for the championship and the Big Ten's bowl performance, and to a lesser extent an undefeated UCF beating Auburn who beat both Bama and UGA, next year is probably the last for the four team format. Add onto that the inconsistency of the Committee's decisions (2014 it was a "13th data point"; 2015 it was strength of schedule; 2016 the 13th data point doesn't matter if you've got quality wins on your side; 2017 the "eye test" matters not data). A four team playoff is probably better than an eight team playoff, but the current "playoff" really isn't a playoff. It's an invitational. An eight team playoff could end up being better in reality. Because the four team format requires a committee of humans to select participants (as opposed to using a rules-based system that generates auto-qualifiers and limits the human element to at-large participants and seeding), the corrosive tendencies of the human factor are always at risk at smothering out the good structural aspects of a four team format. At a certain point, the eight team format becomes less imperfect than the four team format. An eight team format also better accommodates two teams from the same conference.
Click to expand...

I agree that the selection process is the flaw in the current system. I always thought that the BCS system could be used to select the top 4 teams, not a selection committee.
 
BamaProud":gp5ud1q2 said:
Another tidbit worth pointing out is that Auburn is going to have to watch its 2 biggest rivals, who they beat, play for the National Championship. ...that's gotta suck.
Click to expand...
Peachey :smash:
 
PillsburyDoughboy":3igx9udg said:
BamaProud":3igx9udg said:
Another tidbit worth pointing out is that Auburn is going to have to watch its 2 biggest rivals, who they beat, play for the National Championship. ...that's gotta suck.
Click to expand...
Peachey :smash:
Click to expand...


Auburn let UCF beat them so they aint got any right to complain about anything,,,UCF on the other hand might have a gripe,,
 
BamaProud":21fgbnou said:
Another tidbit worth pointing out is that Auburn is going to have to watch its 2 biggest rivals, who they beat, play for the National Championship. ...that's gotta suck.
Click to expand...
Just worry about Georgia.We're over it.It is what it is :roll:
 
i'd love to see UCF play this schedule

09/02 GA Southern
09/09 Clemson
09/16 Mercer
09/23 Missouri
09/30 Miss State
10/07 Mississippi
10/14 LSU
10/21 Arkansas
11/04 Texas A&M
11/11 Georgia
11/18 LA Monroe
11/25 Alabama

instead of.........

08/31 Florida Intl
09/23 Maryland
09/30 Memphis
10/07 Cincinnati
10/14 E Carolina
10/21 Navy
10/28 Austin Peay
11/04 S Methodist
11/11 Connecticut
11/18 Temple
11/24 S Florida
12/02 Memphis
 

Latest posts

Back
Top