Thank you! I started off last year just after I bought the place and rented a bobcat with brush mower. My property was 99% woods. I cut almost 2 acres of open areas to make plots and trails. This has provided some opportunities for my dad and kids to get shots. Not so great on increase of mature bucks for me.The original question was how I develop a habitat plan. Secondly, why are so many plans from different habitat consultants different?
Habitat management is both a science and an art. The science part of it is knowing what deer need habitat-wise. This is the kind of stuff you can learn from a multitude of research projects on the topic. You can read the research yourself or have it taught to you in college. In addition, a habitat consultant needs to understand different deer needs in different parts of the country. What's most important to deer in Michigan or New York State is not the same as what deer need most in Tennessee. What deer need in Tennessee is not necessarily what deer need in South Alabama or northern Florida. Again, these are things that can be learned from the research.
The big differences between different managers' plans are in the "art" of habitat management. The art is combination of two factors: 1) balancing the needs of deer versus the needs of the hunters; and 2) designing plans to make hunting the deer you will be growing/improving/attracting easier to hunt (make their movements more predictable). What I mean when I say "the needs of deer versus the needs of hunters" is that the two may be different. What may be best for deer - property heavy towards impenetrable briers and thick cover - isn't great for hunting. All that cover would hold a huge number of deer but hunting them would be nearly impossible. A balancing act must be created between providing as much desirable habitat for the deer while still maintaining a very huntable property. And then there is arranging habitat to produce more predictable deer travel patterns. Knowing how to do this is can be a combination of science, art and personal experience.
It is this "art" of habitat management that produces so many different plans from different people. Each manager has different personal experiences they incorporate into their plans. In addition, some managers have put more research (collecting hard data) on the effectiveness of their plans over time hence are constantly updating the knowledgebase they're work from.
And although this may sound strange, I'm going to alter my habitat plans based on the skill level of the hunters/landowners I'm working for. If I believe the hunters are highly skilled at hunting that particular type of terrain and are currently killing the best bucks the property is currently producing, I will probably design a more aggressive habitat plan leaning towards deer needs. But if I get the feeling that a lot of the hunters'/landowners' problem is a lack of knowledge on how to hunt the property, I will spend more time on designing the plan to produce more predictable deer travel patterns and hunting locations. I hate to give away one of my secrets, but I've had several highly successful projects where 80% of the improvements were simply due to the amount of time I spent teaching the hunters how to hunt their own property. As I've said many times, I'm not a great hunter. But I've spent an inordinate amount of time designing and running research projects where the goal was to figure out how deer are moving across the landscape. Having a strong understanding of that is a huge factor in designing habitat plans that concentrate deer movement and make for better hunting locations.
If it was just me, I wouldn't have a problem leaning toward a more advance plan, but with my 74 y/o dad with health problems and 2 younger kids, my main focus for the next 5-10 years is make their experience better by seeing more deer and maybe shooting a 2.5 y/o buck. I'm good with killing a mature buck every 3-4 years if it means my dad and kids have great hunts. My dad shot a 2.5 7pt in ML, I was more excited then he was. First buck he's killed in 5 years. I'm good with better habitat for does and fawns to grow the herd. I feel it's gone done some over the last 5-8 years.
Last edited: